Bug#1036739: ITP: gnucap-modelgen-verilog -- Verilog-AMS behavioural modelling for Gnucap

2023-05-24 Thread Felix Salfelder
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Felix Salfelder X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, fe...@salfelder.org * Package name: gnucap-modelgen-verilog Version : 20230520-dev Upstream Contact: gnucap-devel * URL : http://www.gnucap.org/ * License

Bug#714836: qucsator release

2020-10-31 Thread Felix Salfelder
Dear all. We have released qucsator-0.0.20 [1]. It has been part of qucs, but it is also being used without qucs. It will also work in combination with any statically linked (qt3, non-debian) build of qucs or some of its forks. I think it will be good to have qucsator in Debian. Please consider pa

Bug#950198: restinio

2020-05-15 Thread Felix Salfelder
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 11:30:03AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Alexandre Viau] > > The next step would now be to update OpenDHT, which should be quick > > once restinio passes new. > > The restinio package was just accepted into unstable. I am half way through opendht [1]. My package lac

Bug#950198: restinio

2020-04-28 Thread Felix Salfelder
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 01:22:29PM +0200, Sébastien Delafond wrote: > It was perfectly clear the first time, and this is where we can agree to > disagree. Dear Sébastien. Yes, lets agree. > Starting on this project I had a couple of goals. Towards the original goal (getting Jami into Debian), I

Bug#950198: restinio

2020-04-27 Thread Felix Salfelder
Thanks Sébastien for your analysis. On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:10:35PM +0200, Sébastien Delafond wrote: > Before you go ahead on any of this, please let's wait for Alexandre's > input. I agree. > I am unsure where your gut feeling comes from: the smaller package is OK > to simply use as an inclu

Bug#950198: restinio

2020-04-27 Thread Felix Salfelder
Please apologise the flood, I missed something obvious. On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 11:02:23AM +0200, Felix Salfelder wrote: > The freshly imported tarball (0.6.6) contains an embedded dev/asio > directory, which does not exist in the upstream repository, nor was it > in the 0.6.4 t

Bug#950198: restinio

2020-04-27 Thread Felix Salfelder
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 09:07:36AM +0200, Sébastien Delafond wrote: > I've pushed my version of restinio's packaging to > [..] > Let me know if you want me to upload what I've got now to NEW. amazing. thank you. > So we don't forget, here are a couple of items we'll want to fix later > on: > >

Bug#950198: RFH: ring -- Secure and distributed voice, video and chat platform

2020-04-07 Thread Felix Salfelder
On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 04:25:05PM -0400, Alexandre Viau wrote: > If you feel like you have a working package, would you please link me > to a git repository on salsa that I can review? Dear Alexandre. It's working afaict. Not fully complete -- minor details i would hope. See my namespace on sals

Bug#950198: RFH: ring -- Secure and distributed voice, video and chat platform

2020-04-04 Thread Felix Salfelder
> restinio [..] some progress [1]. thanks felix [1] https://mentors.debian.net/package/restinio

Bug#950198: RFH: ring -- Secure and distributed voice, video and chat platform

2020-03-24 Thread Felix Salfelder
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 11:27:25AM -0400, Alexandre Viau wrote: > No, it won't. Why would it be a bottleneck? Well. If it's not, that is only better. > We need to package restinio. This is the first step. Nothing else. I pushed the package to mentors (using dput). I was expecting it to show up [

Bug#950198: RFH: ring -- Secure and distributed voice, video and chat platform

2020-03-23 Thread Felix Salfelder
Dear Alexandre. > It looks like you are trying to do many things at once. > > Instead of trying to fix everything in one go, I would suggest that we > pick one problem and move from there. Thanks for your feedback. I tried to update my Jami installation, when connections to newer Jami clients br

Bug#950198: RFH: ring -- Secure and distributed voice, video and chat platform

2020-03-18 Thread Felix Salfelder
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 08:36:07PM -0500, Alexandre Viau wrote: > I would love to update Jami[1] (https://jami.net) in Debian. I have prepared some preliminary packages [0,1,2,3]. It seems to run without a lot of patching, but pjp. I'm afraid there is more work to do... cheers/hth felix [0] http

Bug#920449: ITP: gnucap-custom -- gnucap-custom provides a basis for customisation of the GNU circuit analysis package

2019-01-25 Thread Felix Salfelder
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Felix Salfelder * Package name: gnucap-custom Version : 0.0.1 Upstream Author : Felix Salfelder * URL : https://gitlab.com/gnucap/gnucap-custom * License : GPLv3+ Programming Lang: C++ Description : A basis for

Bug#908150: ITP: gnucap-python -- Python bindings for the GNU circuit analysis package

2018-09-06 Thread Felix Salfelder
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Felix Salfelder * Package name: gnucap-python Version : 0.0.0 Upstream Authors: Felix Salfelder , Henrik Johansson (-2009?) * URL : http://gnucap.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/gnucap:user:gnucap_python * License