Hello Adam,
>
> First, some great news: Salomé was accepted into unstable! Now we can
> file multiple independent bugs and track all of these issues separately.
Excellent! I am really glad to hear it.
>
> > I feel really sorry for the wrong patch that I sent you, the reason
> > is that I forgot
For not
reproducing the same problem, I am going to build a new Salome version
and send you patches carefully once everything works.
By the way, is the 'git-builpackage' command that exports CXXFLAGS
to '-O2 -g'? I could not yet understand that step.
Best regards,
André
> On T
st regards,
André
> On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 12:06 +0200, Andre Espaze wrote:
> > Hi Adam,
> >
> > Sorry for the lack of news, I was focus on making VISU work. I have
> > succeeded to build a Salome package however the current result is
> > unfortunately split from ou
Hi Adam,
Sorry for the lack of news, I was focus on making VISU work. I have
succeeded to build a Salome package however the current result is
unfortunately split from our development line. That's why I will first
explain my steps and then ask your advice on the merge as I saw that
serious reorga
Hi Adam,
Sorry for the delay, I have missed the -6 release but I have
just built the -7 one which works fine. I have updated the
documentation on:
http://wiki.debian.org/BuildingSalome
It seems that building Med dependencies by hand is no longer needed
because libmed-2.3.6-2 is now available in De
Hi Adam,
> >
> > > I guess that it is not relevant to run the 5.1.3-4 build again
> > > if this version works for you. I am now starting a complete build
> > > with all modules.
> >
> > I've built -5 with everything but VISU and NETGENPLUGIN (which don't
> > build), they're at http://lyre.mit.e
to see a first
working version in Debian.
All the best,
André
commit 30d1a66cc4b1a4023a1397391ed8bdcf570cd50b
Author: Andre Espaze
Date: Wed Apr 21 09:39:46 2010 +0200
LD_LIBRARY_PATH is required for runSalome
Exporting the variable LD_LIBRARY_PATH is required for starting Salome
Hi Sylvestre,
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 04:18:45PM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Le mardi 20 avril 2010 à 15:25 +0200, Andre Espaze a écrit :
> >
> > > By the way, have you had any luck with asking upstream to adopt some
> > of
> > > these patches? Let me know i
Hi Adam,
> Apologies for the long delay in replying since your message arrived.
> I've been very busy, and just yesterday finally compiled Salomé.
No problem, I have been busy too last week and I am now coming back
on Salomé.
>
> > I made the KERNEL and GUI modules work this morning on the 5.1.3-
at it is not relevant to run the 5.1.3-4 build again
if this version works for you. I am now starting a complete build
with all modules.
Best regards,
André
commit 82657a24389490922d070d883cb79730caabc69e
Author: Andre Espaze
Date: Wed Apr 7 10:43:38 2010 +0200
Building Salome with KERNEL an
Hi Adam,
> Hi everyone and apologies for the long delay since I last wrote.
No problem, I was also busy on others projects but I am back
on Salomé for this week and I should work full time on it
for the week starting on the 19th of april.
>
> I've been getting VirtualBox to work, as suggested b
Hi Adam,
> > The last working version was actually the -4:
> >
> > c56f196854092f0dc0d222de71de1a4532f214ec
> > Release 5.1.3-4 "Look ma, it builds!"
>
> That's what I thought. I tried that one today (backported to Ubuntu
> Karmic), and it didn't work. I guess I'll have to bring X up i
Hi Adam
>
> On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 12:12 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 17:36 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
> > > However, I got a runtime error with my version, the study server is
> > > not found even if I only work with the KERNEL and GUI mo
Hi Adam,
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 10:05 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
> > > > > > Until salome is uploaded into Debian, it will not be possible to
> > > > > > use the
> > > > > > bug tracking system for i
Hi Adam,
>
> On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 10:05 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
> > > Until salome is uploaded into Debian, it will not be possible to use the
> > > bug tracking system for individual issues. At this point, the only
> > > "bug" in Debian is that sa
Hi Adam,
>
> Until salome is uploaded into Debian, it will not be possible to use the
> bug tracking system for individual issues. At this point, the only
> "bug" in Debian is that salome isn't there -- #457075. :-)
Ok, so from now I organise tickets on
http://www.python-science.org/project/salo
> I think this is getting into the technical details, so it is probably
> not so interesting to the debian-science list. I'm afraid I can't
> figure out a way to set up an account on ww.python-science.org; if you
> can let me know how then I'll go ahead and use that.
A message with your first and
Hi Adam,
Thank you very much for your fast reply. I am sorry for not being as
responsive, I am new to Debian packaging and I am also discovering git.
> > I have succeeded to build most of the Salomé modules with the
> > version 5.1.3-3 that you uploaded at http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/salome/
>
Hi Adam,
I am André Espaze, the Logilab's employee supposed to help you in the
Salomé packaging for Debian. First I wanted to thank you for the great
work that you did on the current package. Then I would like to let you
know my progress on the testing part.
I have succeeded to build most of the
19 matches
Mail list logo
