> I think this is getting into the technical details, so it is probably
> not so interesting to the debian-science list. I'm afraid I can't
> figure out a way to set up an account on ww.python-science.org; if you
> can let me know how then I'll go ahead and use that.
A message with your first and last names needs to be send to:
nicolas.chau...@logilab.fr
However Nicolas just told me that Sylvestre would prefer to use the
Debian tracking system. Do you know where should I move the work from
http://www.python-science.org/project/salome-packaging?
>
> In the meantime, I'd like to let you know how to build the versions of
> dependencies I'm using.
>
> I don't know why the med-fichier tests are failing with HDF5 1.8.4. To
> build my patched hdf5 package for Debian, you can do the following (in a
> Debian unstable chroot):
>
> apt-get source hdf5
> rm -rf hdf5-1.8.4/debian
> svn co svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-grass/packages/hdf5
> cp -a hdf5/trunk/debian hdf5-1.8.4/
> wget
> 'http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=27;filename=hdf5-default-mpi.patch;att=1;bug=510057'
> -O hdf5-default-mpi.patch
> cd hdf5-1.8.4/
> patch -p0 < ../hdf5-default-mpi.patch
> dpkg-buildpackage
>
> Install the resulting .deb packages, particularly libhdf5-mpi-dev which
> should depend on libhdf5-openmpi-dev. Then you can build the latest
> med-fichier using:
>
> git clone
> http://git.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/med-fichier.git -b master
> cd med-fichier
> git-buildpackage
>
> It should all build correctly. At this point, does this version of
> med-fichier pass or fail the tests?
All the tests pass, that is really great. I would like to add such
documentation do the salome.git repo, inside the debian directory. I
have added the following ticket:
http://www.python-science.org/ticket/1403
that will certainly move.
>
> You can get and build my latest salome package by the same "git clone"
> command but substitute salome for med-fichier. It still needs a lot of
> tweaking before it is ready to upload into Debian unstable. And first
> the patched HDF5 package needs to go in, along with the new med-fichier.
I have succeeded to build salome at revision
181964c525693f410d01646a616e5d94f05c7c9d but I got only KERNEL and GUI
running out of the box at the end. I plan to investigate on the GEOM
runtime problem first, is it allright for you?
Then I have some questions regarding the packaging workflow. My main
problem is that running::
git-buildpackage --git-ignore-new
cleans everything and start from scratch. By the way I had to add
the '--git-ignore-new' option but did not understand why. I finally use:
./debian/rules build
for building everything after small changes. And:
./debian/rules install
for then testing the updated version in debian/tmp. The step that I
did not find is how to apply the series of patch once I pull from
http://git.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/salome.git
Reading:
http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/ch-build.en.html#s-completebuild
I did not find the tool. I first thought about the dpatch candidate but
the command is not installed on my system so I wonder how git-buildpackage
works.
André
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100217105932.gb28...@crater.logilab.fr
