Package: wnpp
Followup-For: Bug #84395
Was going to file an RFP, when I found this.
Please consider actually packaging it. Since 2001, the original
development has been picked up and greatly extended, now running
on the modern Linux. I was able to compile it out of the box
and running on today's s
Your message dated Mon, 25 Oct 2004 23:50:39 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ITP: suphp -- Apache module to run php scripts with their
owners permissions
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: apt-dupdate
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : me
* License : BSD
Description : diff-based update of APT's index files
apt-dupdate is beeing written right now. The server part is almost done,
the client should be not a
That report somehow found its way into the mailqueue before it was
supposed to be sent. I apologise, below is the missing info:
Version: 0.9.1
Upstream Author: Roberto Cavada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL: http://sra.itc.it/people/cavada/mvc/
License: LGPL
Again, my apo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: python-gtkmvc
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
Description : Model-View-Controller (MVC) implementation fo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: scim-qtimm
Version : 0.7.5
Upstream Author : LiuCougar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : scim.freedesktop.org
* License : (GPL 2)
Description : Qt3 IM module with SCIM as backend
SCIM (Smart Common Input Method)
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: skim
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : liuspider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://scim.freedesktop.org/
* License : (GPL)
Description : Smart Common Input Method platform for KDE/QT
skim is an input meth
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: rdflib
Version : 2.0.4
Upstream Author : Daniel Krech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://rdflib.net
* License : own license, free, osi certified
Description : A python library for working with RDF
RDFLib i
Your message dated Tue, 26 Oct 2004 08:08:30 +1300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Close ITP bug for Axyl, which is now in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: grutatxt
Version : 2.0.10
Upstream Author : Angel Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.triptico.com/software/grutatxt.html
* License : GPL
Description : Text to HTML (and other formats) converter.
IMHO, the following names makes most sense since they
1) tell where the theme/style/icons/whatever is/are used
2) follow some current "naming schemes" [0]
qt-styles-foobar
kwin-decorations-foobar
kde-icons-foobar
The construction of these package names is pretty clear.
[0] ---
Tim Small wrote:
Here is a package diff against 3.2.0. I probably can't do any more
work on this for a few months. I may be able to spend some time
testing tho'...
Tim.
Thanks once again and a thousand times.
Now upstream has decided to adopt a config-file based configuration
mechanism,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: libhttp-cache-transparent-perl
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Mattias Holmlund
URL : http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/HTTP/
License : Perl
Description : cache http requests transparently
HTTP::Cac
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Sun, Oct 24, 2004:
>
>> This has been integrated into the acpi.sf.net patch, so is fairly likely
>> to end up in the mainstream kernel before too long.
>
> Oh never read of that, do you have some pointers? Are you su
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 18:02:51 +0200
Sebastian Ley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Ricardo Mones wrote:
>
> > * Package name: libical0
>
> Are you aware that libical is currently pretty unmaintained upstream and
> has a lot of nasty bugs? In fact all projects who needed an ical parser
> (e.g. K
* Ricardo Mones wrote:
> * Package name: libical0
Are you aware that libical is currently pretty unmaintained upstream and has a
lot of nasty bugs? In fact all projects who needed an ical parser (e.g. KDE
PIM, evolution, OpenGroupware.org...) all dropped libical, forked it or wrote
somethi
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:58:01 +0100
Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ricardo Mones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > * URL : http://www.softwarestudio.org/libical/
>
> The last version of this appears to have been released in 2002. Is there
> any sign of ongoing development
Ricardo Mones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * URL : http://www.softwarestudio.org/libical/
The last version of this appears to have been released in 2002. Is there
any sign of ongoing development, and is there any software that actually
uses this library?
--
Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL
Your message dated Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:47:24 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package has entered unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Your message dated Mon, 25 Oct 2004 15:51:24 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ITP: python-biopython -- Python modules for computational
molecular biology
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Michael Koch writes:
>
> Your choice, I'm okay with it.
>
The fix (see below) will be be commited within the hour.
After that it is up to you to build the package. Are we clear on this ?
(i.e. when the patch is commited I have to wait for you to build
the package and I have nothing le
Am Montag, 25. Oktober 2004 14:38 schrieb Loic Dachary:
> Michael Koch writes:
> > Do you mean package version or library version (aka soname) ?
> > For the second feel free to choose a unique one.
>
> Ok. What about -version-info 10:0:0 for the CVS version ?
> It reminds of the fact that the la
Michael Koch writes:
> Do you mean package version or library version (aka soname) ?
> For the second feel free to choose a unique one.
Ok. What about -version-info 10:0:0 for the CVS version ?
It reminds of the fact that the last release has a 9 in it. Of course,
as time passes these ve
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: sndpeek
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Ge Wang
* URL : http://soundlab.cs.princeton.edu/software/sndpeek/
* License : GPL
Description : sndpeek is a light-weight app which performs feature
extraction on a
Am Montag, 25. Oktober 2004 13:39 schrieb Loic Dachary:
> Michael Koch writes:
> > Am Montag, 25. Oktober 2004 12:30 schrieb Loic Dachary:
> > > Michael Koch writes:
> > > > Would it be an idea for you to not use a cal3d-cvs package
> > > > and directly use the normal cal3d package and update
Michael Koch writes:
> Am Montag, 25. Oktober 2004 12:30 schrieb Loic Dachary:
> > Michael Koch writes:
> > > Would it be an idea for you to not use a cal3d-cvs package and
> > > directly use the normal cal3d package and update it to some
> > > recent CVS thats known to work. I don't want s
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 07:39:54PM +0300, Teemu Ikonen wrote:
> Hi,
hi,
> I noticed your ITP bug #266824 on mozilla-sunbird. Have you made any
> progress on the packaging or did you decide to not do it?
as you can see, i renamed my submitted ITP into RFP. this means i'm
not working on sunbird an
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : cal3d-cvs
Version : 20041022
Upstream Author : Bruno 'Beosil' Heidelberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Laurent
Desmecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Justin Hare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chad Austin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://cal3d.sf.net/
* License : LGPL
Hi,
Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Tue, Jul 08, 2003:
> * Package name: madwifi
Anything new? Did you manage to get the drivers working?
I saw you had packages online at http://nchipin.kos.to/madwifi/, are
they ready for upload? It seems these are for a february version of
mad
Hello
Kimdaba v2.0 was just released. It would be really nice is this
application was provided as a debian package.
See http://ktown.kde.org/kimdaba/news.htm
Thanks
--
Dominique Dumont
"Delivering successful solutions requires giving people what they
need, not what they want." Kurt Bittner
Hi Riku,
What is the status of your package? When are you going to upload?
I did package it myself without much problems and it works...
If you don't have the time, maybe I can take over?
Cheers
David
--
David Schweikert| phone: +41 44 632 7019
System manager ISG.EE | walk: ETH Zentru
Your message dated Mon, 25 Oct 2004 10:49:27 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line there is already an ITP for this package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
It looks like Tomboy uses artwork from the Tintin cartoon strip and I
very much doubt that the distribution terms are compatible with the
DFSG. Unless the author has explicit permission from the copyright
holders to distribute the Tintin icon under the LGPL, we cannot
redistribute this software.
33 matches
Mail list logo
