On Sun, 2012-01-22 at 22:32 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 07:13:35PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 07:33:34PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > I think it builds fine on non-smp buildds, which at the time of the
> > > Squeeze release were fan
On Sun, 2012-01-22 at 23:20 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 10:11:40PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-01-22 at 22:32 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > I have built both kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386 versions on
> > > non-SMP mac
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 19:11 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Please give back vtk. By doing so, this will automatically fix
> #661383. CMake stores hardcoded path to libz.so which recently changed
> due to Multi-Arch transition.
I assume you mean it needs binNMUing?
https://buildd.debian.org/stat
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 07:14 +0200, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
> This package failed on ia64 due to a lack of disk space on the
> builder.
Given back.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wb-team-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas.
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 14:27 +0400, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> Could you give back erlang 1:15.b.1-dfsg-1 for mips and mipsel
> architectures? The both builds failed for no apparent reason (can't
> find any usable error message in buildd logs, rebuild in mips QEMU
> went fine). I guess they failed due
On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 23:51 +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
> Can you please gb openturns on mipsel? It was failed because rem has
> less than 512 MB of RAM, which is insufficient to build the package.
Given back, although there's no guarantee that it won't just get picked
up by rem again.
Regards,
Adam
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 09:20 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Please binNMU netgen on armhf to link against new OCE libraries.
Scheduled. For future reference, binNMU requests can be sent to the
release team (c.f reportbug release.debian.org).
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 20:46 +0200, Micha Lenk wrote:
> gnucash (= 1:2.4.10-3) build-depends on one of:
> - libgoffice-0.8-dev (= 0.8.17-1.1+b1)
>
> But the package libgoffice-0.8-dev (= 0.8.17-1.1+b1) seems to be
> available in the archive since almost two months now, as could be seen
> here:
On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 10:28 +, Bas van den Dikkenberg wrote:
> Thehurd-i386 version fail due to bug in gblicIt should be fixed by
> the latest glibc upload.
>
>
>
> gb burp_1.3.8-1 .hurd-i386
debian-release is not the correct contact point for that - you want
debian-wb-team or $arch
Hi,
On 10.07.2012 17:09, Ryan Kavanagh wrote:
basic256 used to FTBFS on ia64[0] due to
/usr/lib/ia64-linux-gnu/libxml2.so.2: undefined reference to
`gzopen64@ZLIB_1.2.3.3'
I've successfully test-built it on merulo.debian.org. The ia64 buildd
should thus try building it again.
gb basic256_0.
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 19:01 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Please give back plastimatch:
>
> gb plastimatch_1.5.11+dfsg0-1 . i386
>
> insighttoolkit 3.20.1+git20120521-3 was uploaded to fix an issue with
> a new behavior with gcc 4.7.0 and signaling NaN on i386 (#682805)
Done.
Regards,
Adam
On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 20:02 +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
> 2012/7/29 Jonathan Nieder :
>
> > Based on [1], leptonlib was built on praetorius 8 days ago but
> > never got uploaded. Known problem? Does it need any nudging
> > to get put into place?
>
> JFYI, I am experiencing same problem with aircr
On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 21:58 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 08:46:57PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mgltools-bhtree
> > but all I get is
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mgltools-sff
>
> Yes, I was actuall
On 01.12.2012 11:10, Ivo De Decker wrote:
The t-p-u upload of libatomic-ops failed to build on powerpc. There
is no
build log on
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libatomic-ops&suite=wheezy
Can the build be tried again?
There's no log because it hit #680100, so trying it again i
On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 17:28 +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> Some build seem to be stuck on mips.
It looks like there's an issue with one of the buildds, indeed.
> For these, the missing builds block testing migration:
>
> qt4-x11
> lowmem (also Too young, only 5 of 10 days old)
> adplug (this one
On Tue, 2013-01-01 at 14:51 +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> *** glibc detected *** /usr/bin/perl: malloc(): memory corruption
> (fast): 0x02443018 ***
> [8<]
> dpkg-shlibdeps: error: dpkg-query --control-path libc6:s390x
> shlibs died from signal 6
>
> I think it's a transient erro
On Sun, 2013-03-10 at 23:22 +0100, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> gb elmerfem_6.1.0.svn.5396.dfsg2-2 . armel armhf
> gb kernsmooth_2.23-9-1 . armel armhf
> gb r-cran-xml_3.95-0.2-1 . armel armhf
> gb robustbase_0.9-7-1 . armel armhf
> gb survival_2.37-4-1 . armel armhf
All done.
Regards,
Adam
--
To
On Sun, 2013-03-24 at 15:05 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Please give back firebird2.5 to sparc. It had a compiler segfault
> during the build:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=firebird2.5&arch=sparc&ver=2.5.2~svn%2B54698.ds4-3&stamp=1363963113
This was already handled via a req
On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 05:18 +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
> Perhaps I need to clarify that I'm the only DD in pkg-netsim team and
> I've talked with the uploader about this request before sending it, so
> please give-back ns3_3.17+dfsg-1 on armhf if possible.
According to https://buildd.debian.org/status/
On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 17:39 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> (Is there another flag needed to denote the target "wheezy"? I don't see
> anything in http://release.debian.org/wanna-build.txt)
See the first item under "notes".
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wb-team-requ...@lis
On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 20:45 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> The TARGET distribution is only needed if the request
> does not target unstable, i.e. experimental or wheezy.
At the risk of seeming picky, you mean "e.g." here.
> Hmm, wheezy or stable ?
Either will work. The buildds use codenames
On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 20:45 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> The following might be more helpful:
>
>PKGS_VER . ARCHES [ . TARGET ] [ . -m 'changelog entry/dep-wait
> expr.' ]
fwiw, the reason I didn't use that approach initially was because it
makes the line > 80 characters. That may not be
On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 16:08 +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
> Please retry (due to #710841):
>
> kdenetwork
> mysql-workbench
Given back.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wb-team-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.or
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 21:00 +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
> yade 0.97.0-4 failed to build on ia64 with "segmentation fault".
> Last 4 times yade failed on "mundy". Other machines are building
> it fine. Please, give it beack:
Done.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wb-team-requ...
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 20:56 +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
> gmsh 2.7.1.dfsg-2 failed to build on mips due to "Bus error".
> Gmsh is always failing on "ball". Please, give it beack:
aiui, that always indicates a bug in the code. Done, anyway...
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wb-
On Sat, 2013-06-01 at 19:30 +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
> alglib 3.7.0-5 failed to build on sparc due to a failed autotest.
> It can be caused by numerical instability of some tests.
Could the tests not be fixed?
> Please, give it beack:
Done.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 17:33 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Now that GHCi is disabled on ARM, haskell-conduit should be buildable
> (because doctests will automatically be skipped).
>
> gb haskell-conduit_1.0.5.1-1 . armel
Given back.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wb-team-req
On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 19:57 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2013-06-21 Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > libvigraimpex FTBFS on some archs. The errors are unreproducible (I
> > actually did successful builds on porter machines for s390x and
> > mipsel) and the source identical previous upload to exper
On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 19:07 +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> A recent upload of gtkmm2.4 caused some problems with k3d, please give
> back k3d in the arches where it was not built correctly due to this
> version being present (1:2.24.3-1). Now a new upstream version fixing
> this prob
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 15:37 +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> * kdepimlibs/ia64
> ld failed with an assertion:
> gb kdepimlibs_4:4.10.5-1 . ia64
As per #debian-release, this has been done already.
>* meinproc4 segfaults on mipsel
> it seems like on some builds (all done on rem) meinproc4 crashed; all
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 09:28 +0200, D. Barbier wrote:
> Could you please give-back oce on mipsel, eysler had been unable to
> setup the chroot.
Done.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wb-team-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@l
On Sat, 2013-07-20 at 09:59 +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> It seems some still failed, could it be possible to give them back
> again?
> gb kbruch_4:4.10.5-1 . mipsel
> gb kgeography_4:4.10.5-1 . mipsel
> gb rocs_4:4.10.5-1 . mipsel
Done.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wb-tea
On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 15:02 +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> Apparently rocs still fails :/
> The file it is compiling (DotGrammar.cpp.o) is a C++ graphviz grammar
> parser written in Boost.Spirit (so template metaprogramming), which
> indeed makes it take quite some memory, possibly more than what r
On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 12:43 -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> gb webkitgtk_2.0.4-2 . i386 . -m "Transient failure in the builder - out of
> memory"
Ugh; done.
For reference, give-backs don't take a message (i.e. no "-m").
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wb-team-requ...@
On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 01:21 +0200, Tobias Hansen wrote:
> aseprite failed to build on mips and mipsel 52 days ago. I just tried on
> a mips porter box and it built without problems. Maybe that's because of
> a new version of gtest.
>
> gb aseprite_0.9.5-3 . mips mipsel
Done.
Regards,
Adam
--
On Tue, 2013-09-03 at 22:27 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Would it be possible to schedule schroot for a rebuild/binNMU in
> unstable, and experimental if possible. I'd like it to be rebuilt
> against the new Boost 1.54 library packages. If a maintainer upload
> is preferable, I could do that inste
On Thu, 2013-09-05 at 20:25 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> mplayer2 failed to build on kfreebsd-i386 due to #720440 which is now
> fixed in mpg123. I confirmed on fischer that mplayer2 now builds
> successfully on kfreebsd-i386, so please give it back:
>
> gb mplayer2_2.0-701-gd4c5b7f-2 . kfr
On Fri, 2013-09-06 at 17:08 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> gb qutecom_2.2.1+dfsg1-4 . ia64 mips mipsel s390 s390x
> dw qutecom_2.2.1+dfsg1-4 . mips mipsel . -m "libboost-thread1.54-dev (>=
> 1.54.0-3)"
Done.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wb-team-requ...@lists.debian.
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 20:21 +0200, Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
> At the same time, a new version of openttd, which build-depends on
> grfcodec is available, which I've just uploaded to unstable. I'd like to
> be sure that building it will not be attempted using the broken grfcodec
> 6.0.2 build on mip
On Fri, 2013-09-20 at 00:20 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> nmu haskell-tls-extra_0.6.3-2 . powerpc . -m
> 'libghc-cryptohash-dev-0.8.4-ed942 not available any more'
>
> This is a retry of the binnmu since the previous one failed due to
> praetorius running out of disk space.
In which case, it needs a
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 20:40 +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
> Dear wb-team and ftp-masters,
Neither of those teams are responsible for testing migration. As the
domain of the URL you quoted indicates, the release team are. I'm
copying debian-release on this reply; please direct further responses
there.
On Fri, 2013-09-27 at 15:07 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> gb csound_1:6.00.1~dfsg-2 . mipsel .
>
>
> Please give csound back.
Done.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wb-team-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.or
On 2013-11-04 15:12, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
package beast-mcmc fails on i386 due to a missing dependency on
libhmsbeagle-java (>= 1.1r1092).
As this package already migrated to testing, the dependency should be
fulfilled now.
It may well be, but there's now a different issue:
beast-mcmc bu
[not sure if you're subscribed, so erring on the assumption that you're
not; please say if you'd prefer not to get CCed]
On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 19:05 +0100, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Nov 2013, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > For reference, packages in such a state (
On 2013-12-22 4:59, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
The mipsel build failed due to inactivity. It's built before so I'd
like you
to re-schedule the build.
gb boost1.54_1.54.0-4 . mipsel
Done.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wb-team-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 01:20 +0100, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> please retry building of ruby-hiredis on armhf. It appears the
> tests are a bit timing specific, but I couldn't reproduce the
> build failure on harris.d.o.
>
>gb ruby-hiredis . armhf
Done.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 01:40 +0100, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> please retry building of ruby-kyotocabinet on kfreebsd-amd64.
> I tried reproducing the build failure ('Terminated') on falla.d.o,
> but the package built fine there.
It looks like this was done; the package has been installed on
k
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 20:19 +0100, Julian Taylor wrote:
> the underlying issue was in zeromq3 which is now fixed.
Given back.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wb-team-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive
On 2014-02-25 9:55, Johannes Schauer wrote:
with dpkg 1.17.2 we now have support for build profiles in dpkg. Build
profiles
allow to enable or disable dependencies and build or not build binary
packages
when one or more build profiles are activated. For build dependencies
this
looks like this:
On 2014-02-25 10:31, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 2014-02-25 9:55, Johannes Schauer wrote:
with dpkg 1.17.2 we now have support for build profiles in dpkg. Build
profiles
allow to enable or disable dependencies and build or not build binary
packages
when one or more build profiles are activated
On 2014-02-25 10:49, Johannes Schauer wrote:
Quoting Adam D. Barratt (2014-02-25 11:35:37)
> The more general issue is that you need dpkg in stable to support them.
>
> A lot of Debian infrastructure that touches source packages runs on
> stable (for fairly obvious reasons) and ex
On Sat, 2014-04-26 at 16:58 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> [+ debian-admin, debian-wb-team ]
>
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 07:15:03AM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
[...]
> > 12:33 < Ganneff> ftpmaster takes what dsa runs. dsa takes backports.
> > 12:35 < adsb> I'd suspect they'd prefer a stable updat
Hi,
tl;dr: do stable and stable-security chroots apply P-a-s correctly?
DSA 2952-1 updated kfreebsd-9 in wheezy-security. As it was built on all
architectures for which kfreebsd-9 was available in wheezy, it was then
also accepted in to proposed-updates. It appears that packages for some
other ar
On Sun, 2014-07-27 at 00:22 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 09:29:47PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > Oh well, you just uncovered a bug that was not exposed widely because
> > there's
> > a fallback P-a-s in the toplevel directory:
> >
> > * All the triggers source triggers/
On 2014-08-05 12:12, Joachim Breitner wrote:
I may be mistaken, but I have the impression that the archive mirror
at /srv/wanna-build/tmp/archive on wuiet is no longer updated (last
update 20:00 yesterday. I *believe* it used to be updated more than
once
per day).
As an additional data point,
Hi,
I scheduled binNMUs for libgcrypt20 a few days ago, but something odd
seems to be going on.
The binNMUs claim to have been building on all architectures for several
days - rather than the expected few minutes - but in each case I checked
the buildd in question had built several other pac
On 2014-12-02 11:21, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Adam D. Barratt, le Tue 02 Dec 2014 11:03:57 +, a écrit :
I scheduled binNMUs for libgcrypt20 a few days ago, but something odd
seems
to be going on.
The binNMUs claim to have been building on all architectures for
several
days -
[...]
YAML
On 2015-01-13 10:23, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Hello,
Please give-back openvdb_2.3.0-2 on sparc and mipsel.
That's not possible, given that there aren't any currently failed builds
on those architectures.
Did you mean some other architectures?
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
On Sun, 2015-05-03 at 16:05 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
[...]
> This doesn't seem to have built:
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=perl&suite=jessie
>
> This appear to be related to the change in 5.20.2-2 to make perl depend on
> a matching perl-base (see #779455). However t
On 2015-06-30 12:54, Esa Peuha wrote:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ocaml-fdkaac&suite=sid
claims ocaml-fdkaac has been in state BD-Uninstallable for a while on
all architectures except amd64 because of missing libfdk-aac-dev, but
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=fd
On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 22:25 +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> python-cffi FTBFS on arm64 because of a libffi bug (#785756). A version
> fixing that bug just hit unstable.
>
> So, please,
>
> gb python-cffi_1.1.2-1 . arm64
Done
> gb python-cffi_1.1.2-2 . arm64
>
> (The second one is for an uploa
On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 18:44 +0200, Luca Bruno wrote:
> Dear wb-team,
> latest openldap upload (2.4.40+dfsg-2) saw a spurious failure in its
> testsuite
> on mipsel.
> As diff with previous version is quite limited and failure unrelated, we
> suspect this was a momentary glitch somewhere.
>
> Ca
Hi,
It looks like wanna-build updates for suites other than sid and
experimental broke on Saturday morning.
Looking on wuiet, the mirror pushes seem to be working okay (as
archive/debian/archive is up-to-date) but something is apparently
breaking after that - for instance:
-rw-r--r-- 1 wbadm wba
[CC += ftpmaster]
On Sun, 2015-08-30 at 21:57 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> It looks like wanna-build updates for suites other than sid and
> experimental broke on Saturday morning.
>
> Looking on wuiet, the mirror pushes seem to be working okay (as
> archive/debian/archive is
On Sun, 2015-08-30 at 22:09 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> [CC += ftpmaster]
>
> On Sun, 2015-08-30 at 21:57 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > It looks like wanna-build updates for suites other than sid and
> > experimental broke on Saturday morning.
[...]
> Looking on ft
On 2015-10-23 11:56, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
I didn't say once per arch. I said once per package, which is worse. I
normally
schedule binNMUs for several dozens packages. Multiply that by several
But you need to look the number up anyway? The
On 2015-10-23 12:02, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
wanna-build does, yes, but at least the Release Team tend to use the
"wb"
wrapper tool which automatically works out the next free number on
each
architecture.
Ah, cool – so we have only to
On 2015-10-23 13:28, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
[...]
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
It's also not quite that simple, even working things out by hand - see
#599128
for example.
Hm, I’m still under the impression that the +bN suffix to the Debian
version of the package i
On Sat, 2016-02-27 at 19:26 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Andreas Beckmann, on Sat 27 Feb 2016 15:58:29 +0100, wrote:
> > could someone check the status of tsocks on hurd and kfreebsd, the
> > packages are listed as "Uploaded" for "41 days". Something seems to need
> > a little shakin
On 2016-12-21 11:42, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 21/12/16 12:39, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
as explained below auto builders should either have dpkg 1.18.15 or
1.18.17 (see bug #848422).
The chroots will be updated in a few hours.
It's also generally safe to assume that the relevant team
On Sat, 2016-12-24 at 09:00 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Hi. Can you reschedule a build of gdk-pixbuf on mips64el? We have
> tried to reproduce the failure reported in
> https://bugs.debian.org/849136 > without success.
Looks like someone did that yesterday evening.
Regards,
Adam
On Sat, 2017-08-12 at 01:14 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 12:09 AM, Roger Shimizu
> wrote:
> > To whom may concern,
> >
> > I just noticed that buildd status page doesn't show properly as usual,
> > for example:
> > - https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=linux
>
On 2019-01-30 13:19, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
Hi Everyone,
This may be an opportunity for improvement in the build logs. I'm a
fellow who helps maintain a library (Crypto++), which is packaged by a
Debian maintainer (László).
As a side note, "Debian maintainer" (usually with an upper-case "M")
r
On Fri, 2019-12-27 at 11:54 +0100, Pino Toscano wrote:
> because of the update of libglvnd/mesa/qt5, some packages failed to
> build, and were given a Dep-Wait on the newer qtbase-opensource-src.
> The fixed version was already built and installed yesterday, however
> the packages are still stuck w
On Fri, 2020-02-07 at 18:50 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Andreas Beckmann (2020-02-06):
> > please do the right thing to help node-yarnpkg out of the Uploaded
> > state
> > in sid where it is for 50+ days already.
> >
> > Should there be some process that automatically reports stale
>
On Wed, 2020-04-08 at 20:40 +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
> - ftpmaster +wanna-build
>
> Missatge de Jim Sughrue del dia dc., 8
> d’abr.
> 2020 a les 16:43:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The key for graphs here is chopped off such that the graph can't be
> > interpreted: https://buildd.debian.org/stats/
> >
> >
Hi,
On Wed, 2021-06-02 at 15:50 +0200, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> Greetings, Fellow Developers,
>
> I would like in this mail to advocate the unblocking of the
> transition for two
> packages:
>
The debian-wb-team list is related to the buildd network, not testing
migration.
If you want to reque
Hi Adrian,
While checking the status of the linux upload to proposed-updates this
morning, I noticed that the packages for mipsel and mips64el were still
in the BD-Uninstallable state, whereas those for some other
architectures had already started building.
Further investigation showed that you r
Hi,
I've just pushed a few changes to the "wb" tool:
* The expansion of "ALL" in architecture lists is now distribution
specific and includes all architectures for the given distribution; this
means that for unstable it now includes hurd-i386.
* A distribution name may now be specified inline, u
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 19:48 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> * The expansion of "ALL" in architecture lists is now distribution
> specific and includes all architectures for the given distribution; this
> means that for unstable it now includes hurd-i386.
On Sun, 2010-06-06 at 13:12 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> First, I intended to create a state "known", which is the maximum of
> installed and needs-build, i.e. for take, failed, attempted, ... it
> behaves like needs-build, for binNMU it behaves like installed, and it
> doesn't set packages from n
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 21:30 +0100, Hector Oron wrote:
> I just build test on abel.d.o, same hardware as most buildds nowadays.
>
> [...]
> dpkg-deb: building package `libforks-perl' in
> `../libforks-perl_0.34-1_armel.deb'.
> dpkg-genchanges >../libforks-perl_0.34-1_armel.changes
> dpkg-genchang
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 13:09:43 +0200, Ondřej Kuzník wrote:
I'm helping maintain the package quodlibet and a really weird thing
has happened lately.
A transition has resulted in a binNMU on one of the binary packages
(quodlibet-ext). After that I packaged a new version of the software,
removing that
On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 12:23 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Please reeschedule ruby-cairo to build again on all archs except i386
> and amd64.
fwiw, it already built successfully on hurd-i386 as well.
> ruby-cairo could not build before because of a bug in ruby-pkg-config
> (#632323). A fixed ru
On Sat, 2011-07-16 at 10:25 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Forwarding to debian-release@, in charge of binNMUs.
>
> - Forwarded message from Michael Biebl -
[...]
> As part of the multiarch conversion I removed the libtool .la files.
> I checked all rdeps of gdk-pixbuf according to [1],
On Sat, 2011-07-16 at 11:03 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > - Forwarded message from Michael Biebl -
[...]
> > libunicap2-dev (src:unicap)
> > libvdk2-dev (src:vdk2)
> > libmdc2-dev (src:xmedcon)
> >
> > Please schedule binNMUs for those p
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:58:14 +0200, Eugeniy Meshcheryakov wrote:
Details:
* -d experimental to specify the target distribution (when it's not
unstable).
* -o because the package was marked as “Failed”, so needed an
override,
see below.
I was using information from
http://release.debian
On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 08:49:07 +0100, Christopher Baines wrote:
The maintainer for simgear has been updating parts of the library for
the openscenegraph transition. However this appears to make fgrun
segfault (when built with simgear 2.0.0-2 at least).
gb fgrun_1.5.2-1 . ALL . -m 'simgear-dev (>
[simgear maintainer added to Cc]
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 18:25:28 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 01:19:59PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 08:49:07 +0100, Christopher Baines wrote:
>The maintainer for simgear has been updating parts of the library
for
&
On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 18:15 +0100, Christopher Baines wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 17:39 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > There are indeed a few suspicious looking changes in -3 though:
> >
> > -virtual void forceLoad(osgDB::DatabasePager* dbp);
> > +v
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 12:43:26 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Op maandag 03 oktober 2011 19:48:47 schreef Thijs Kinkhorst:
Hi Kurt,
Op zondag 25 september 2011 17:48:46 schreef Kurt Roeckx:
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 01:35:46PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > I also don't understand why they get rejec
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 18:49 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 12:15:40PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > >
> > >I prefer that at least the krb5-appl and opensaml2 builds are made
> > >available
> > >before the point release this weekend.
On Thu, 2025-02-06 at 22:02 +0100, Sven Geuer wrote:
> package acstore does not change status from Uploaded to Installed.
> The build log does not seem to exhibit any cause for this. Giving
> back the package fails due to being uploaded.
A failure to move from Uploaded almost always means that the
On Sun, 2025-05-18 at 19:43 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Removed trixie* from mipsel-osuosl-0{3,4,5}'s config. Did not restart
> buildd as builds were in progress. Could not reach the conova ones.
I updated setup-all-dchroots in Puppet to stop trying to generate
mips64el trixie chroots. (They fail
On Mon, 2025-07-14 at 18:40 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
[...]
> > We will be upgrading ftp-master and related hosts from bullseye to
> > bookworm. Expect downtimes, delays in upload and release
> > processing, and
> > generally reduced service over the weekend.
> > ...
>
> updating incoming.d.o b
95 matches
Mail list logo
