Re: Bug#1031589: Handling of RC bugs in firefox-esr

2023-02-24 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 09:19:40AM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >... > Also note that one of the concerns was for armhf, which is now being built > from arm64 buildds. >... On armhf there is a 4 GB FTBFS for the future (like on i386), and a 3 GB FTBFS today that still seems to be present o

Re: Bug#1031589: Handling of RC bugs in firefox-esr

2023-02-24 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 24/02/2023 09:48, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 09:19:40AM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: ... Also note that one of the concerns was for armhf, which is now being built from arm64 buildds. ... On armhf there is a 4 GB FTBFS for the future (like on i386), and a 3 GB FTBFS

Re: Bug#1031589: Handling of RC bugs in firefox-esr

2023-02-24 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 12:27:35PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 24/02/2023 09:48, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 09:19:40AM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > > ... > > > Also note that one of the concerns was for armhf, which is now being built > > > from arm64 b