On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 12:27:35PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 24/02/2023 09:48, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 09:19:40AM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > > ...
> > > Also note that one of the concerns was for armhf, which is now being built
> > > from arm64 buildds.
> > > ...
> >
> > On armhf there is a 4 GB FTBFS for the future (like on i386),
> > and a 3 GB FTBFS today that still seems to be present on some buildds.
> >
> > While some armhf buildds have a 4 GB userspace address space that is
> > sufficient at least today, several buildds still run into the
> > debian/rules test for 64bit:
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=firefox&arch=armhf
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=firefox-esr&arch=armhf
> >
> > arm-ubc-0* had out of memory before the debian/rules test for 64bit,
> > so there might be a genuine issue that firefox-esr cannot be built
> > on these buildds and still might have to be blacklisted:
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=firefox-esr&arch=armhf&ver=91.11.0esr-1
>
> My understanding was that those buildds were going to be decommissioned. But
> if that's not going to happen in the short term, a blacklist for firefox-esr
> and thunderbird would be in order.
antheil/hartmann/hasse/henze/hoiby have been decommissioned as planned.
I do not know whether arm-ubc-0{4,5,6} are also planned to be
decommissioned, as of right now they are still running.
> Cheers,
> Emilio
cu
Adrian
