kicking them out without a proper investigation takes
time, and the MIA process, i.e. the only accepted "investigation"
method, likewise take a ton of time (and the fairly limited amount of
empathy from the people doing it).
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 6
pect for doing what you do! :)
If it can comfort you, I think there were like an hundred more a couple
of years ago or somesuch (number coming out of my mind).
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD
%.
So I'd have some questions:
* Are rejected votes that are then retried and validated still counted
as rejects?
* what constitutes a reject?
* if the rejects are caused by formatting issues in the voting mail (I
never tried nor ever had a rejected vote myself), can something be
mad
Just dropping my 2cents:
On Sat, 6 Nov 2021, 12:09 am Felix Lechner,
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 2:45 PM Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> >
> > I am pretty sure that was a 100% calculated move
> > to go directly to this.
>
> It was impromptu. The mail was intentional only in the sense that I
> hoped
and any further seconds
> >for the same extension proposal will be ignored for the purpose of
> >this paragraph. In case of doubt, the Project Secretary decides how
> >the order of seconds is determined.
> >
> > 4. The first two successful t
lot" instead of "this amendment"
(following the new GR flow), I sponsor this.
If I were to add my thoughts: political GRs don't belong in Debian,
please take them elsewhere. For non-political votes there is no use
for private voting.
--
regards,
> This has been argued already it seems.
Yes, it's already been discussed, I doubt it needs to be discussed even
more here, and I surely don't want to.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .
w verification
> [ ] Choice 3: Reaffirm public voting
> [ ] Choice 4: Further Discussion
AFAIK, FD doesn't exist anymore, this should be NOTA now.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
ns not
to in some specific case that we can't foresee.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.n
eus-proposed-cyber-resilience-act/
>
> https://blogs.eclipse.org/post/mike-milinkovich/european-cyber-resilience-act-potential-impact-eclipse-foundation
>
> https://labs.ripe.net/author/maarten-aertsen/open-source-software-vs-the-proposed-cyber-resilience-act/
> https://blo
> === END GR TEXT ===
Seconded.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapre
ead asking for
this detail to be specified in the ballot, and I think it should be
outlined in this one too.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https:
to spend on DPL duties? etc, etc.
> I've been struggling to find the right place to help Debian work better
> together and to help people solve problems without so much escalation
Any other area you'd work on? If so, what "improvements" would be
working toward?
--
re
run
> some tool.
>
> *Usually* they do not do that during running elections, just short before
> they start,
> so you may be out of luck.
You could try to contact the keyring-maint team, maybe they are willing
to do an ad-hoc update to include your key, but I expect you'll be o
14 matches
Mail list logo
