On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 02:51:08PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I stay in constant contact with a wide range of people involved in core
> team. Just to give two examples, I'm in regular contact with Matt
> Zimmerman (security) and Pascal Hakim (listmaster), but the same go
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 05:27:24PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> I guess it's been decided that Debian doesn't care to stop the bullying
> and outrageously abusive language.
No; mostly we just file craig sanders' mail in /dev/null.
--
- mdz
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 10:34:49PM -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> In a little under 24 hours from now, at the time of writing,
> the polls shall close for the GR resolving future handling of the
> non-free section. At this point, with 433 unique voters, we are still
> 21 voter
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 08:28:42PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > As I balance, I think we should make it clearer to bug submitters that
> > they can re-open bugs and that feedback is encouraged.
>
> What about where a bug is closed by the
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 12:06:05PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 01:49:12 +1000, Anthony Towns
> said:
> > I'm sorry, you're mistaken. It was against Andrew's interpretation
> > of the social contract. It wasn't against mine, nor to the best of
>
> It certainly was
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 12:44:49PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I've cc:ed our stable release manager, ftp-masters, and the security
> team, in the hopes that they'll offer some insight into their
> understanding of their own responsibilities for sarge if this GR passes.
My assumption would be
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 01:56:40PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 11:20:50AM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 12:44:49PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > > I've cc:ed our stable release manager, ftp-masters, and the s
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 01:28:17PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:02:42PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> >
> > I'm offline at the moment and the exact URL escapes me, but this list is
> > on www.debian.org and was created about 2 yaers ago.
> [...]
> > Release mana
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 02:51:08PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I stay in constant contact with a wide range of people involved in core
> team. Just to give two examples, I'm in regular contact with Matt
> Zimmerman (security) and Pascal Hakim (listmaster), but the same go
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 05:27:24PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> I guess it's been decided that Debian doesn't care to stop the bullying
> and outrageously abusive language.
No; mostly we just file craig sanders' mail in /dev/null.
--
- mdz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 10:34:49PM -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> In a little under 24 hours from now, at the time of writing,
> the polls shall close for the GR resolving future handling of the
> non-free section. At this point, with 433 unique voters, we are still
> 21 voter
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 08:28:42PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > As I balance, I think we should make it clearer to bug submitters that
> > they can re-open bugs and that feedback is encouraged.
>
> What about where a bug is closed by the
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 12:06:05PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 01:49:12 +1000, Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > I'm sorry, you're mistaken. It was against Andrew's interpretation
> > of the social contract. It wasn't against mine, nor to the best of
>
>
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 12:44:49PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I've cc:ed our stable release manager, ftp-masters, and the security
> team, in the hopes that they'll offer some insight into their
> understanding of their own responsibilities for sarge if this GR passes.
My assumption would be
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 01:56:40PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 11:20:50AM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 12:44:49PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > > I've cc:ed our stable release manager, ftp-masters, and the s
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 11:07:04PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> I suppose most the proposers feel the same. Why they resort to such a
> desperate means is something to think about, IMHO.
Having thought about it, my conclusion is that they are behaving
irrationally.
--
- mdz
--
To UNSUBSC
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 05:18:34PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> The people actualy putting amd64 on hold are ftpmasters. And I don't think
> he can include any discussions with ftpmasters since all the mail sent to
> them on this issue made its way into /dev/null.
Was that before or after the re
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 12:51:51AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> So what technical issues are there? And please reply with your ftp-master
> hat on. All we hear is "there are issues and ftp-master will post
> something soon" but you never say what.
Consider the situation from their perspec
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 06:13:38AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> On mar, 2004-07-13 at 21:41 +0100, James Troup wrote:
> > If anyone thinks this GR will actually achieve anything positive,
> > they're mistaken.
>
> Are you trying to say you would work against the decision of the
> majority of
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 03:42:17PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> It's fair to ask users to upgrade, but it's not fair to ask them to do so
> every 6 months. Many organisations will want to spend 6 months testing a
> new release before rolling it out. I've no objection to releases every 6
> month
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 08:27:04PM -0300, Blu Corater wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 11:53:51PM +0100, Romain Francoise wrote:
> > Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > How do you see the relation between Debian and Ubuntu in the future?
> >
> > Note that the LWN article about t
On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 09:25:32AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> Since October of 2002, HP has sponsored a subscription to LWN for all
> interested Debian developers, so this shouldn't be an issue for anyone
> eligible to vote in DPL elections.
And thanks for that; it's been a great benefit to De
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 01:28:17PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:02:42PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> >
> > I'm offline at the moment and the exact URL escapes me, but this list is
> > on www.debian.org and was created about 2 yaers ago.
> [...]
> > Release manag
23 matches
Mail list logo
