On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 12:06:05PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 01:49:12 +1000, Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> > said: > > I'm sorry, you're mistaken. It was against Andrew's interpretation > > of the social contract. It wasn't against mine, nor to the best of > > It certainly was against what I took the social contract to > be. I never imagined that Debian was about only part of main being > free, indeed, as Bruce has stated, I, too, was under the impression > that the SC and the DFSG applied to everything on the Debian CD.
I do not see how it can be maintained that these were "editorial changes" when there is clearly a significant number of developers who believe that the meaning of the Social Contract was changed (to the point of forcing action that was not forced before). -- - mdz
