Louis-Philippe Véronneau writes:
> On 2021-03-22 16 h 43, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
>> Le vendredi, 19 mars 2021, 17.49:54 h CET Louis-Philippe Véronneau a écrit :
>>> On 2021-03-19 08 h 02, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I've been telling a few people last month that I would really liked to
>>>
Jonas Smedegaard writes:
> Quoting Gard Spreemann (2021-03-23 16:18:10)
>>
>> Louis-Philippe Véronneau writes:
>>
>> > On 2021-03-22 16 h 43, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
>> >> Le vendredi, 19 mars 2021, 17.49:54 h CET Louis-Philippe Vér
Hello, and thanks for your answers!
Sruthi Chandran writes:
> On 23/03/21 2:41 pm, Bart Martens wrote:
>> 1/ One way of addressing this, is actively BENEFIT the underrepresented
>> profiles. Positive discriminiation is needed, at least to get over an initial
>> resistance. Put diversity in the s
Margarita Manterola writes:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 6:59 PM Roberto C. Sánchez
> wrote:
>
>> Essentially, voting in this GR is implicitly
>> compulsory and there is only one correct way to vote.
>
>
> Also not true. The GR is to vote whether Debian issues a statement about
> this or not. If y
Jonas Smedegaard writes:
> Quoting Sruthi Chandran (2021-03-25 18:29:32)
>>
>>
>> On March 25, 2021 2:24:16 AM GMT+05:30, Steve Langasek
>> wrote:
>> >Under 4.1.5 of the Constitution, the developers by way of GR are the
>> >body who has the power to issue nontechnical statements.
>> >
>> >h
Sruthi Chandran writes:
> On March 25, 2021 2:24:16 AM GMT+05:30, Steve Langasek
> wrote:
>>Under 4.1.5 of the Constitution, the developers by way of GR are the
>>body
>>who has the power to issue nontechnical statements.
>>
>>https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io/blob/m
Sean Whitton writes:
> Hello,
>
> Seeking seconds:
>
> ===BEGIN
>
> Replace the entire text with:
>
> Under section 4.1.5 of the constitution, the Developers make the
> following statement:
>
> The Debian Project echoes and supports recent calls to remove Richard
> M. Stallman from positions of
Sruthi Chandran writes:
> On 26/03/21 10:45 pm, Sruthi Chandran wrote:
>
> Re-sending with fixed signature and replacing twitter link with
> gnusocial link.
>
>
>> Begin text
>>
>> Under section 4.1.5 of the constitution, the Developers make the
>> following statement:
>>
>> *Debian’s
Sergey B Kirpichev writes:
> The simple (not just one) problem is: I did (now, in past) some work for
> the Debian - but I can't vote. Yet, the project do political decisions
> on my behalf.
Is it a problem when someone goes and works and pays taxes in a country
where they're not a citizen? Do
Sergey B Kirpichev writes:
>> Is it a problem when someone goes and works and pays taxes in a country
>> where they're not a citizen?
>
> Oh, package maintainers are not Debian's citizens... Great idea, just
> put this on the top of debian.org to attract new contributors. This
> is not transfo
Jonathan Wiltshire writes:
> CHOICE TEXT FOLLOWS:
>
> This is a position statement of the Debian Developers in accordance with
> our constitution, section 4.1.5.
>
> The Developers firmly believe that leaders in any prominent organisation
> are, and should be, held to the highest standards of ac
Sergey B Kirpichev writes:
> Obviously, you want to turn the Debian into something "more than
> that". But have you fixed all bugs in the packages you do support?)
Is this how you behave when discussing political matters in general too?
"This one important problem isn't fully resolved, therefo
Hello, and thank you for this effort.
Russ Allbery writes:
> A.2. Withdrawing ballot options:
>
> […]
>
> 4. The default option cannot be withdrawn.
This is the most minor of near-useless pedantic comments on my part, but
A.2.4 seems redundant: If only the proposer of a ballot option may
withdr
Felix Lechner writes:
>> I'm a native German speaker and "Führer" is widely and
>> completely uncontroversially used in German in lots of contexts
>
> That is, as you noted, somewhat true for the word "master" as well,
> but your portrayal of a wide and unequivocal acceptance of the word
> "Führ
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
> PS For people who are concerned that a retreat from the term "master" is
>somehow the language police run dangerously amok, it's worth asking
>why you feel so committed to the term "master" that you would fight
>to keep the project we all work on using t
Ansgar writes:
> On Mon, 2022-02-14 at 18:47 -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> I think there are problematic uses of votes well beyond harassment
>> though.
>>
>> * After this, I think the next vote is going to be about firmware.
>> Do we want companies like Nvidia who may have opinions about how
>
Ansgar writes:
> On Wed, 2022-02-16 at 13:27 +0100, Gard Spreemann wrote:
>> Ansgar writes:
>>
>> > On Mon, 2022-02-14 at 18:47 -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> > > I think there are problematic uses of votes well beyond
>> > > harassment
>>
Sorry for replying twice, I accidentally left out one reply.
Ansgar writes:
> On Wed, 2022-02-16 at 13:27 +0100, Gard Spreemann wrote:
>> Ansgar writes:
>>
>> > On Mon, 2022-02-14 at 18:47 -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> > > I think there are p
Bill Allombert writes:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 09:41:49AM +0100, Christian Kastner wrote:
>> Currently, the Project has no legal standing of its
>> own, meaning that within any legal context, there is no Project.
>
> Indeed, it is a great feature of Debian that it is not bound to any
> particu
Holger Levsen writes:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 01:35:14PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>> Debian does not exist, legally :-)
>
> and that's a feature, not a bug.
Could you elaborate on this? We've heard arguments for why it might be a
bug – and we can have a discussion about whether that's true o
On August 23, 2022 5:38:52 PM GMT+02:00, Simon Josefsson
wrote:
> I have no problem
>with builtin non-upgradeable firmware -- see
>https://ryf.fsf.org/about/criteria for rationale.
Hi!
I've always had a really hard time understanding that rationale, despite not
doubting the FSF's good intentio
Roberto C. Sánchez writes:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 12:29:12PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 07:53:22AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>> > Can we have a clear statement of what "directly affects people"?
>>
>> for those having lost people due to covid, hearing so
Russ Allbery writes:
> Ansgar 🙀 writes:
>
>> In addition it reintroduces trust in weak cryptographic hashes which
>> effort was spent to remove.
>
> I think this concern is significantly overblown and attempted to explain
> precisely why I believe that in my security review. I'll also point ou
23 matches
Mail list logo
