k for some reason this should not be fixed, and sorry for
the big cross-post :).
- brian.
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 09:53:23PM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> sorry for the crosspost.
>
> there's a typo in the constitution, at least both copies I have.
> I noticed it going over the webs
http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote-0102/msg7.html
did bdale silently withdraw his nomination?
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 03:57:24AM -, Raul Miller wrote:
> As has previously been announced
> (http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote-0102/msg4.html), polls for the
> debian leader election w
>
> Heaven forbid a DPL with a sense of humour ;)
Fraternal Debian Droids, When Elected Leader I will..
Kill all humans!
err.
--
Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian/GNU Linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.debian.org
LPSG "member"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
ant.
#debian-private does exist, but nobody goes in there.
the channel description reads:
Description: This channel is only for Debian Developers
+ NM Applicants + Mirror Admins + OPN Gods + people vouched
for by one of the previous groups
Which I disagree with. I think it should be Debian
Develope
rephrase that "There are certain people
> who display personality and behaviour traits that are extremely
> irritating to a majority of the general population, and indeed, would
> elicit emotionally heated responses from the nominal human being
> exposed to the subject under discussio
2? What goals (if any) should be set along the way?
ObVote,
It seems the principal task here would be to effectively identify just which
applications (packages) are affected by IP4->IP6, I anticipate that you'd find
a long list of these.. (quirky dns resolution.. etc)
- brian.
--
d
> > > for at least a year from voting or is this a bug?
> >
> > It's worse than that.
>
> The cannonical location of the keyring on all debian.org machines is
> /org/kering.debian.org/
At the risk of stating the obvious typo:
/org/keyring.debian.org/
--
Bria
ROTECTED]) as sender.
>
> If I'm the only one who is bothered by this requirement just forget it.
> If there are more people who don't like this "feature" we should try
> to change it if there isn't any security issue.
Signing it AND sending it from @d.o addre
first candidate.
>
> Or should it have been a ballot of -1234 or 1234- ?
>
> Anyway, i guess my ballot was also wrongly acounted, but i will wait for the
> second confirmation now, ...
CONSPIRACY!!
I demand a manual recount..
--
Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian/GNU
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 09:26:37PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 02:14:26AM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> > CONSPIRACY!!
> > I demand a manual recount..
>
> Aside: check out www.gwbush.com. Cheesy, but there's a few
> funny bits. Like the
wish.
is this just a euphemism for "pandering to the mob" ?
i.e. no conviction in your beliefs.
sure, dpl should weigh developers decisions, no doubt there.
but the way you say "making decisions based on what the developers
wish", i interpret that to mean he will essentially
have a thread start on d-d-a..
--
Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian/GNU Linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.debian.org
LPSG "member"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.lpsg.org
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
k for some reason this should not be fixed, and sorry for
the big cross-post :).
- brian.
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 09:53:23PM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> sorry for the crosspost.
>
> there's a typo in the constitution, at least both copies I have.
> I noticed it going over the webs
http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote-0102/msg7.html
did bdale silently withdraw his nomination?
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 03:57:24AM -, Raul Miller wrote:
> As has previously been announced
> (http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote-0102/msg4.html), polls for the
> debian leader election wi
> Heaven forbid a DPL with a sense of humour ;)
Fraternal Debian Droids, When Elected Leader I will..
Kill all humans!
err.
--
Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian/GNU Linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.debian.org
LPSG "member"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.lpsg.org
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
ant.
#debian-private does exist, but nobody goes in there.
the channel description reads:
Description: This channel is only for Debian Developers
+ NM Applicants + Mirror Admins + OPN Gods + people vouched
for by one of the previous groups
Which I disagree with. I think it should be Debian
Develope
rephrase that "There are certain people
> who display personality and behaviour traits that are extremely
> irritating to a majority of the general population, and indeed, would
> elicit emotionally heated responses from the nominal human being
> exposed to the subject under discussio
d
> > > for at least a year from voting or is this a bug?
> >
> > It's worse than that.
>
> The cannonical location of the keyring on all debian.org machines is
> /org/kering.debian.org/
At the risk of stating the obvious typo:
/org/keyring.debian.org/
--
Bria
ROTECTED]) as sender.
>
> If I'm the only one who is bothered by this requirement just forget it.
> If there are more people who don't like this "feature" we should try
> to change it if there isn't any security issue.
Signing it AND sending it from @d.o addre
first candidate.
>
> Or should it have been a ballot of -1234 or 1234- ?
>
> Anyway, i guess my ballot was also wrongly acounted, but i will wait for the
> second confirmation now, ...
CONSPIRACY!!
I demand a manual recount..
--
Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian/GNU
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 09:26:37PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 02:14:26AM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> > CONSPIRACY!!
> > I demand a manual recount..
>
> Aside: check out www.gwbush.com. Cheesy, but there's a few
> funny bits. Like the
wish.
is this just a euphemism for "pandering to the mob" ?
i.e. no conviction in your beliefs.
sure, dpl should weigh developers decisions, no doubt there.
but the way you say "making decisions based on what the developers
wish", i interpret that to mean he will essentially transl
have a thread start on d-d-a..
--
Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian/GNU Linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.debian.org
LPSG "member"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.lpsg.org
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
ould be set along the way?
ObVote,
It seems the principal task here would be to effectively identify just which
applications (packages) are affected by IP4->IP6, I anticipate that you'd find
a long list of these.. (quirky dns resolution.. etc)
- brian.
--
Brian Russo <[EMAIL
24 matches
Mail list logo
