Hi, everyone.
Now that we have concluded deciding our GR procedure, I'd like to come
back to the question of secret ballots that we decided to defer from the
last round.
As a reminder, that discussion started at
https://lists.debian.org/tslilx2fuo8@suchdamage.org
In <87a6ic6wl1@arioch.
Sam Hartman writes:
> So, to be specific, I propose to add a paragraph 8 to section 4.1
> (powers of the developers):
> 8. Override a decision of the secretary. Overriding the secretary's
>determination of the majority required for a ballot option or
>overriding the determina
Hi,
Personally I am not sure that the secretary needs a challenging process,
given how he/she/they is chosen and how the general vote process works.
However, when he/she/they needs to take a decision, it is because the
constitution enables him/her/them to do it, for defined situations. The
qu
On Sat, 29 Jan 2022, Sam Hartman wrote:
> So, to be specific, I propose to add a paragraph 8 to section 4.1
> (powers of the developers):
>
> 8. Override a decision of the secretary. Overriding the secretary's
>determination of the majority required for a ballot option or
>over
> "Jean-Philippe" == Jean-Philippe MENGUAL writes:
Jean-Philippe> secret vote does not make part of them, if I remember
Jean-Philippe> correctly the constitution and the debate, so the
Jean-Philippe> debate was about intrepreting the text about this.
The specific question that ros
5 matches
Mail list logo
