On Sat, 29 Jan 2022, Sam Hartman wrote: > So, to be specific, I propose to add a paragraph 8 to section 4.1 > (powers of the developers): > > 8. Override a decision of the secretary. Overriding the secretary's > determination of the majority required for a ballot option or > overriding the determination of the outcome of a vote requires that > the developers agree by a 3:1 majority. The secretary's > determination of whether a 3:1 majority is required to override > the project secretary is not itself subject to override.
I see the intention here. My initial thought is that the constitution already enables overriding by replacing the secretary through §4.1.7, assuming the project leader and secretary disagree. [§4.1.1 (recalling the DPL) could be employed if they agree.] If we add this, the intersection of §4.1.8 and §4.1.7 should be addressed when it comes to questions requiring a supermajority. -- Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong.com No matter how many instances of white swans we may have observed, this does not justify the conclusion that all swans are white. -- Sir Karl Popper _Logic of Scientific Discovery_
