I propose the following General Resolution, which will require a 3:1
majority, and am seeking sponsors.
Rationale
=
We have uncovered several problems with the current constitutional
mechanism for preparing a Technical Committee resolution or General
Resolution for vote:
* The timing of
Russ Allbery writes:
> I propose the following General Resolution, which will require a 3:1
> majority, and am seeking sponsors.
And, of course, as soon as I do that, I notice a few remaining typos.
Please ignore this message; corrected version coming in just a few minutes.
--
Russ Allbery (r.
I propose the following General Resolution, which will require a 3:1
majority, and am seeking sponsors.
Rationale
=
We have uncovered several problems with the current constitutional
mechanism for preparing a Technical Committee resolution or General
Resolution for vote:
* The timing of
* Russ Allbery [2021-11-20 10:04]:
I propose the following General Resolution, which will require a 3:1
majority, and am seeking sponsors.
Rationale
=
We have uncovered several problems with the current constitutional
mechanism for preparing a Technical Committee resolution or General
Russ Allbery writes:
> This constitutional change attempts to address those issues by
>
> * separating the Technical Committee process from the General Resolution
> process since they have different needs;
> * requiring (passive) consensus among TC members that a resolution is
> ready to proc
Philip Hands writes:
> Although, I think you should fix A.2.3 which currently says:
>> ... sponsors stepping forward, it removed from the draft ballot.
>^
> which I'd suggest needs an 'is', or perhaps 'will be', between 'it' &
> 'removed'
Sigh, thank you. I
> "Russ" == Russ Allbery writes:
Russ> I propose the following General Resolution, which will require
Russ> a 3:1 majority, and am seeking sponsors.
I second your proposed GR regarding voting systems improvements and do
not object to the minor change Philip pointed out and you accep
7 matches
Mail list logo
