On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 04:46:04PM +0200, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote:
> * Kurt Roeckx [2016-07-08 16:21:32 +0200]:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 03:37:08PM +0200, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote:
> > > === BEGIN GR TEXT ===
> > >
> > > Title: Acknowledge that the debian-private list will remain private.
Hi Kurt,
* Kurt Roeckx [2016-07-16 20:52:03 +0200]:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 04:46:04PM +0200, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote:
> > * Kurt Roeckx [2016-07-08 16:21:32 +0200]:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 03:37:08PM +0200, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote:
> > > > === BEGIN GR TEXT ===
> > > >
> > > >
I hereby propose the following amendment to the currently proposed GR.
=== BEGIN GR TEXT ===
Title: Declassifying parts of -private of historical interest
1. The 2005 General Resolution titled "Declassification of debian-private
list archives" is repealed.
2. Debian listmasters and/or other
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 01:17:24PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> 2. Debian listmasters and/or other individuals delegated by the DPL to
>do so are authorized to declassify excerpts of -private of historical
>interest by any process which provides sufficient opportunity for
>Debian Devel
Hi Don,
Thanks for your amendment.
I'm very close to seconding it. However, I wonder why, in the second phrase,
you're restricting the process of objecting to declassification to a GR.
* Don Armstrong [2016-07-16 13:17:24 -0700]:
> I hereby propose the following amendment to the currently prop
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 09:44:59PM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 01:17:24PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > 2. Debian listmasters and/or other individuals delegated by the DPL to
> >do so are authorized to declassify excerpts of -private of historical
> >interest by any
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 10:52:00PM +0200, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote:
> I'm very close to seconding it. However, I wonder why, in the second phrase,
> you're restricting the process of objecting to declassification to a GR.
Oh, I think there might be an ambiguity here. I am interpreting Don's
text a
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 13:17:24 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> 2. Debian listmasters and/or other individuals delegated by the DPL to
>do so are authorized to declassify excerpts of -private of historical
>interest by any process which provides sufficient opportunity for
>Debian Develo
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 10:57:15PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 09:44:59PM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 01:17:24PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > 2. Debian listmasters and/or other individuals delegated by the DPL to
> > >do so are authori
Stefano Zacchiroli writes:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 10:52:00PM +0200, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote:
>> I'm very close to seconding it. However, I wonder why, in the second phrase,
>> you're restricting the process of objecting to declassification to a GR.
> Oh, I think there might be an ambiguity h
On Sat, 16 Jul 2016, Iain Lane wrote:
> (GRs are, of course, always going to be on the table regardless.)
The procedure and declassification could potentially occur to quickly
for a GR to intervene. I don't expect listmasters or any delegate to
actually do that, though.
On Sat, 16 Jul 2016, Nicol
11 matches
Mail list logo
