Hi Don, Thanks for your amendment.
I'm very close to seconding it. However, I wonder why, in the second phrase,
you're restricting the process of objecting to declassification to a GR.
* Don Armstrong <d...@debian.org> [2016-07-16 13:17:24 -0700]:
> I hereby propose the following amendment to the currently proposed GR.
>
> === BEGIN GR TEXT ===
>
> Title: Declassifying parts of -private of historical interest
>
> 1. The 2005 General Resolution titled "Declassification of debian-private
> list archives" is repealed.
>
> 2. Debian listmasters and/or other individuals delegated by the DPL to
> do so are authorized to declassify excerpts of -private of historical
> interest by any process which provides sufficient opportunity for
> Debian Developers to object by GR prior to declassification.
^^^^^
I don't think those words are necessary.
> 3. In keeping with paragraph 3 of the Debian Social Contract, Debian
> Developers are strongly encouraged to use the debian-private mailing
> list only for discussions that should not be disclosed.
>
> === END GR TEXT ===
Thanks for clarifying,
--
Nicolas Dandrimont
BOFH excuse #449:
greenpeace free'd the mallocs
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
