On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 09:51:08AM +, Anthony Towns wrote:
> I wonder if anyone can name three "big" controversies over the past few
> years that have gotten resolved within Debian?
To the examples provided by Russ, I'd like to add time-based freezes,
which we are doing for Wheezy. I think it
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 09:40:35AM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> it happens every now and then, people assume bad faith in mails from
> others and call their action silly and active tries to sabotage, and
> there are also people who fight for their right to behave like assholes
> and belittle sca
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 02:50:59AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Is there any other policies that you disagree with,
>
> No.
>
> > and would you be looking to change any of these as DPL?
>
> Not without first trying to achieve consensus.
>
I'm slightly confused by my being copied in to you
* Wouter Verhelst [2012-03-13 14:11:30 CET]:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 09:40:35AM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > and there are also people who fight for their right to behave like
> > assholes and belittle scathingly against people that wish for a better
> > communication style.
>
> This, I agr
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 09:46:30PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Recent threads have made me concerned about how well informed some of
> our current DPL nominees are about what is going on within Debian.
>
> My question to the candidates is similar to what I asked in 2010[1]:
> 1. http://lists.debian.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 09:22:48AM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 02:50:59AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > Is there any other policies that you disagree with,
> >
> > No.
> >
> > > and would you be looking to change any of these as DPL?
> >
> > Not without first tryi
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 02:15:14PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Wouter Verhelst [2012-03-13 14:11:30 CET]:
> > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 09:40:35AM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > > and there are also people who fight for their right to behave like
> > > assholes and belittle scathingly against
Stefano Zacchiroli writes:
> According to the constitution we can ask the Technical Committee to make
> such decisions. But we don't have the habit of doing so and I don't
> think the committee would scale if we would start doing so.
I believe the Technical Committee can do better, but I don't w
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 09:47:27AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> In contrast with what we require for the software we distribute, we are
> forbidding to use some of our logos for profit. While there are some clear
> differences between software and carriers of visual identity, I feel that
> ther
9 matches
Mail list logo
