On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 02:39:45PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> This should refer to another text listing the vetted organizations.
> One outside the constitution so it can be changed as needed.
That's usually bad practice in a constitution. You want to change the
constitution if the Debia
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 03:35:26PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Hello Wouter,
> On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 12:45 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Perhaps a formulation like
> >
> > Since Debian has no authority to hold money or property, any
> > monetary donations for the Debian Project mu
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 07:27:04AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Perhaps a formulation like
> >
> > Since Debian has no authority to hold money or property, any
> > monetary donations for the Debian Project must be made to an
> > organization that has
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 09:59:19AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Just for clarity, I'm not going to support maintaining a list as part of
> the constitution; such a list should be outside of it.
Notice that there was a precedent, in the list of fundation documents, which
is separate from the con
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 10:31:43AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 09:59:19AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Just for clarity, I'm not going to support maintaining a list as part of
> > the constitution; such a list should be outside of it.
>
> Notice that there was a preced
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 10:31:28AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
[...]
> After all, you don't need such an organization in _every_
> country; there are a number of countries that have treaties which make
> monetary transactions between them cheap (e.g., the EU).
s/EU/countries using the euro/ but
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 12:40:39PM +0100, Floris Bruynooghe wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 10:31:28AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> [...]
> > After all, you don't need such an organization in _every_
> > country; there are a number of countries that have treaties which make
> > monetary transac
Hi,
How about simplifying the strictures in the constitution to
something like this:
] Since Debian has no authority to hold money or property, any
] monetary donations for the Debian Project must be made to any
] one of a set of organizations designated by the DPL to b
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 12:40:39PM +0100, Floris Bruynooghe wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 10:31:28AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> [...]
> > After all, you don't need such an organization in _every_
> > country; there are a number of countries that have treaties which make
> > monetary transac
On 11 Jun 2006, Martin Wuertele stated:
] Since Debian has no authority to hold money or property, any
] donations for the Debian Project must be made to any
] one of a set of organizations designated by the Project leader
} or a delegate to be authorized to handle such thi
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> The point of the exercise is to avoid having so many organizations and
> so many bank accounts that we would need three professional accountants
> just to keep track. Perhaps I should have worded it as 'no more than one
> such organization shall be active per country'; [...
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Why not just trust the DPL to be reasonable? The language is them
> much simpler, too.
Just to even avoid having to have a reasonable DPL,[1] we could also
require that changes to the list of organisations that are authorized
to hold Debian's assets
12 matches
Mail list logo
