On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 10:31:43AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 09:59:19AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > Just for clarity, I'm not going to support maintaining a list as part of > > the constitution; such a list should be outside of it. > > Notice that there was a precedent, in the list of fundation documents, which > is separate from the constitution. Well, it is a list, but the importance of > it is different,
Absolutely. The foundation documents could be thought of as extensions to the Constitution; we want to protect updates to them with a supermajority as well. The same is not true for organizations to hold Debian bank accounts, I'd say. > so i don't know in how far it is applicable here. How about 'not at all'? ;-) -- Fun will now commence -- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
