Re: Draft ballot for the GFDL vote

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [ ] Choice 1: GFDL licensed works are unsuitable for main in all cases I would personally like to see this without the "in all cases" as an author could add extra statements clarifying their intention or interpretation of the license that coul

Re: Draft ballot for the GFDL vote

Manoj Srivastava wrote: > [ ] Choice 2: GFDL licensed works are free unless unmodifiable sections > present All GFDL works have unmodifiable sections, including at least: * [4D, 4E] Copyright statements * [4A, 4I] Parts of the section entitled "History" * [4F] The permission notice, whic

Re: Draft ballot for the GFDL vote

On 25 Feb 2006, Arthur de Jong outgrape: > >> [ ] Choice 1: GFDL licensed works are unsuitable for main in all >> cases > > I would personally like to see this without the "in all cases" as an > author could add extra statements clarifying their intention or > interpretation of the license that co

New Draft ballot for the GFDL vote

Hi, Note that this is a draft, voting is not yet open. I've made some modifications (for example, we are talking about works licensed under the GFDL, not the GFDL itself), and went back and looked at the emails from the proposer to make sure I am representing their intent, to the best

Nomination

I nominate myself for DPL in this 2006 election. -- It's not true unless it makes you laugh, but you don't understand it until it makes you weep. Eukleia: Ted Walther Address: 5690 Pioneer Ave, Burnaby, BC V5H2X6 (Canada) Contact: 604-430-4973 signatur

Re: AutoResponse - Email Returned SAXK (KMM44554413V37804L0KM)

you have "spam" email me numerous times about possible fraudulent use of my account. I DO NOT HAVE AN ACCOUNT  I would appreciate a response as to what you are doing about this

Re: Nomination

On 10576 March 1977, Ted Walther wrote: > I nominate myself for DPL in this 2006 election. You havent learned from the worst-result of a DPL candidate ever? Even "None of the above" was better than you. -- bye Joerg also dies ist so ziemlich der einzige chanel wo ich meist 0 peile ich schreibe

First call for votes for the GFDL position statement

Voting period starts 00:00:01 UTC on Sunday, 26th February, 2006 Votes must be received by 23:59:59 UTC on Saturday, 11th March, 2006. The following ballot is for voting on a General Resolution to address the Debian project's position on the GNU Free Documentation License. The

nomination

Dear Debian developers, I hereby nominate myself as a candidate for the next Debian Project Leader. Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here. pgpZkdaUzNvnp.pgp Description: PGP signature

Debian Project Leader Election 2006

Hi, The nomination period is at an end, with seven candidates standing forth to be counted (a record). We are now in the campaigning period. The candidates are: o Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] o Ari Pollak[EMAIL PROTECTED] o Steve McIntyre[EMAIL PROT

Debian Project Leader Election 2006 (without typos, this time)

Hi, [ARGGH, I mistyped Aj's name. Again. I do apologize, Mr Towns] The nomination period is at an end, with seven candidates standing forth to be counted (a record). We are now in the campaigning period. The candidates are: o Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] o Ari P

Re: Nomination

On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 12:02:11AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > On 10576 March 1977, Ted Walther wrote: > > I nominate myself for DPL in this 2006 election. > > You havent learned from the worst-result of a DPL candidate ever? > Even "None of the above" was better than you. I find that response