On Thu, 3 Jun 2004 10:50:27 +0200, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> "promise to do regular releases" does not speak about "making our
> release intervals shorter". Of course, the goal is to do a release
> about once a year, but that's not part of the promise.
Fair enough.
>> Ma
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 01:03:43AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I'm disappointed at the amount of nonsense being posted in this thread
> along the following lines:
>
> But this is no excuse for arguing the legal technicalities (`what does
> the Social Contract mean') as opposed to the moral/practic
Andrew M.A. Cater writes ("Re: _Our_ resolution merely affirms the status quo"):
> I posted a comment a long time ago, which might bear repeating
> (something close to the text below IIRC).
>
> The Debian developers changed their policy and fundamental documents
> when the Sarge release was 90% co
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 10:27:58AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> and the only way to do
> this is to use this cited release policy.
I dispute this opinion, and I doubt I'm the only one. For that matter
I dispute the opinion that our users would be best served by releasing
whatever we have on hand.
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 11:01:18AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> I think that you also mean me with your mail. Perhaps you're right,
> and it may be the best to drop both proposals F and G from the ballot.
> I wouldn't stand in the way of dropping both proposals together from
> the ballot, and vote
* Graham Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040605 06:25]:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 11:01:18AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > I think that you also mean me with your mail. Perhaps you're right,
> > and it may be the best to drop both proposals F and G from the ballot.
> > I wouldn't stand in the way of
On Sat, 5 Jun 2004 06:32:11 +0200, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> * Graham Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040605 06:25]:
>> On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 11:01:18AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
>> > I think that you also mean me with your mail. Perhaps you're
>> > right, and it may be the best t
On Sat, Jun 05, 2004 at 06:32:11AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Graham Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040605 06:25]:
> > By dropping proposal F from the ballot, we are dropping the only
> > proposal that does not support releasing Sarge as is. We will not drop a
> > proposal simply because you disa
8 matches
Mail list logo
