Raul Miller wrote:
>> >> >> 1. Debian Will Remain 100% Free Software
>
>> >> This states that everything in Debian is software, and futhermore that
>> >> everything in Debian is free.
>
>> > :%s/and furthermore/and\/or/
>
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 05:27:34PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> No
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 04:27:58AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> I think my comment was actually appropriate and to-the-point.
I beg to differ, but *shrug*
Michael
--
Michael Banck
Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 01:21:33AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> Raul Miller wrote:
>> > * There are people in Debian.
>> Fine, there are a bunch of silly interpretations as well. The context
>> indicates that "Debian" means "the Debian system" or "the Debian
>> dist
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 01:21:33AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Raul Miller wrote:
> > * There are people in Debian.
> Fine, there are a bunch of silly interpretations as well. The context
> indicates that "Debian" means "the Debian system" or "the Debian
> distribution". You could interpre
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 01:21:33AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Raul Miller wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 05:27:34PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> >> No, trust me, we parsed this one very carefully and took an excessive
> >> amount of time on this in debian-legal. There are two possib
Michael Banck wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 01:21:33AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> Raul Miller wrote:
>> > On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 05:27:34PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>
>> >> No, trust me, we parsed this one very carefully and took an excessive
>> >> amount of time on this in debia
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 01:21:33AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > * There are people in Debian.
> Fine, there are a bunch of silly interpretations as well. The context
> indicates that "Debian" means "the Debian system" or "the Debian
> distribution". You could interpret it as meaning "the
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 05:05:57PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> OK, while we're proposing changes
>
> How about "...entirely free software. This includes programs,
> documentation, data, and any other works which are part of the Debian
> system (except possibly license texts which are di
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 05:05:57PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>
> This would clarify the main point that has been spawning endless attempts by
> occasional maintainers to sneak non-free stuff into "main".
what "endless attempts" would these be? have there been any incidents in the
real world
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 07:59:09AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 05:05:57PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
[...]
> you bigots lost the vote (you didn't even come close) - can't you please just
> shut up and go away? do you really have to try to continue the "discussion",
>
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 01:21:33AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Raul Miller wrote:
> > * There are people in Debian.
> Fine, there are a bunch of silly interpretations as well. The context
> indicates that "Debian" means "the Debian system" or "the Debian
> distribution". You could interpre
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 01:21:33AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Raul Miller wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 05:27:34PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> >> No, trust me, we parsed this one very carefully and took an excessive
> >> amount of time on this in debian-legal. There are two possib
Michael Banck wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 01:21:33AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> Raul Miller wrote:
>> > On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 05:27:34PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>
>> >> No, trust me, we parsed this one very carefully and took an excessive
>> >> amount of time on this in debia
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 01:21:33AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> Raul Miller wrote:
>> > * There are people in Debian.
>> Fine, there are a bunch of silly interpretations as well. The context
>> indicates that "Debian" means "the Debian system" or "the Debian
>> dist
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 04:27:58AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> I think my comment was actually appropriate and to-the-point.
I beg to differ, but *shrug*
Michael
--
Michael Banck
Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 01:21:33AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > * There are people in Debian.
> Fine, there are a bunch of silly interpretations as well. The context
> indicates that "Debian" means "the Debian system" or "the Debian
> distribution". You could interpret it as meaning "the
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 05:05:57PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> OK, while we're proposing changes
>
> How about "...entirely free software. This includes programs,
> documentation, data, and any other works which are part of the Debian
> system (except possibly license texts which are di
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 05:05:57PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>
> This would clarify the main point that has been spawning endless attempts by
> occasional maintainers to sneak non-free stuff into "main".
what "endless attempts" would these be? have there been any incidents in the
real world
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 07:59:09AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 05:05:57PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
[...]
> you bigots lost the vote (you didn't even come close) - can't you please just
> shut up and go away? do you really have to try to continue the "discussion",
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
