Michael Banck wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 01:21:33AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> Raul Miller wrote:
>> > On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 05:27:34PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>
>> >> No, trust me, we parsed this one very carefully and took an excessive
>> >> amount of time on this in debian-legal. There are two possible
>> >> interpretations, but both come out to an "and".
>
>> > That's so bogus I don't know where to start.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> Start by learning English better?
>
> I would be *really* grateful if you could limit /this/ discussion to
> something civil.
>
> So either drop your usual insults or drop -vote from your mailbox.
I presume this is addressed to Raul, for his insulting statement above?
Given that most of the rest of my message was devoted to explaining
precisely why his "and/or" interpretation was impossible for someone with
sufficient understanding of English, I think my comment was actually
appropriate and to-the-point.
--
Make sure your vote will count.
http://www.verifiedvoting.org/
