On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 01:02:18PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 07:52:10PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > Editorial amendments to the social contract
>
> > I believe that both of these GRs can begin the SRP immediately. They
> > were designed to be mutually independent
Quoting MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 2004-02-21 20:09:57 + Stephen Stafford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > I firmly believe that keeping non-free and contrib until such time as
> > ALL of
> > the needs of our users can be met from main is a good thing.
>
> As you write it, this is
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 01:22:34AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> On 2004-02-21 23:50:37 + Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I second this.
>
> How can you? Is it a proposal or an amendment? Donkey or poultry?
>
> Did you forget your GnuPG signature, or have I broken my email ag
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 01:48:48AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
>
> ==
> Acknowledging that some of our users continue to require the
On 2004-02-23 14:37:35 + Stephen Stafford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
IMO it will be decided by simple evolution. When everything that
users want
to
do can be done with software in main, then there won't be the
incentive for
developers to carry on maintaining packages in non-free.
I th
On 2004-02-23 16:21:29 + Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I suppose that Sean's comment was in light of both ATI and NVidia,
being
the two major graphic card vendors out there, decision to no more
provide documentation for their recent graphic card, thus meaning the
death of 3D suppo
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 10:17:19PM +, Jochen Voss wrote:
> 2) Raul Miller
> submitted 9 Feb 2004
>
> No seconds
>
> Maybe there are older version with seconds?
I'm dropping my proposals in favor of the one recently proposed
by Anthony Towns.
[Aside: I've been off the net sin
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 04:16:46PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> On 2004-02-23 16:21:29 + Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >I suppose that Sean's comment was in light of both ATI and NVidia,
> >being
> >the two major graphic card vendors out there, decision to no more
> >provide documen
On 2004-02-23 19:57:21 + Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Well, if you manage to persuade those players, and a bunch of other
binary-only driver writers, to free their stuff, more power to you,
[...]
Given your previous comments about the unicorn device and your role
with XFree86,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
We are well into the final week of he nomination period for
candidates for the position of the Debian Project Leader.
Time Line:
Nomination period: Feb 7th 00:00:01 UTC -- Feb 28th 00:00:00 UTC
Campaigning period: Feb 28th 00:0
* Anthony Towns (aj@azure.humbug.org.au) [040221 17:10]:
> I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
>
> ==
> Acknowledging that some of our users continue to require the use of
> programs that don't conform to the Debian Fr
Andrew Suffield wrote:
I would hope that everybody who has a vote already knows what we want
the social contract to say, because they agreed to it when they joined
the project. The question of whether or not to keep non-free is
entirely orthogonal and does not affect this GR, by design.
Uh,
* Anthony Towns (aj@azure.humbug.org.au) [040223 04:40]:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 07:52:10PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > Editorial amendments to the social contract
>
> > I believe that both of these GRs can begin the SRP immediately. They
> > were designed to be mutually independent so the
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 01:17:13AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> On 2004-02-21 20:09:57 + Stephen Stafford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >I firmly believe that keeping non-free and contrib until such time as ALL of
> >the needs of our users can be met from main is a good thing.
>
> As you write
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 01:48:48AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
>
> ==
> Acknowledging that some of our users continue to require the use of
> programs that don't conform to the Deb
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 01:02:18PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 07:52:10PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > Editorial amendments to the social contract
>
> > I believe that both of these GRs can begin the SRP immediately. They
> > were designed to be mutually independent
Quoting MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 2004-02-21 20:09:57 + Stephen Stafford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > I firmly believe that keeping non-free and contrib until such time as
> > ALL of
> > the needs of our users can be met from main is a good thing.
>
> As you write it, this is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 01:48:48AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
>
> ==
> Acknowledging that some of our users continue to require the
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 01:22:34AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> On 2004-02-21 23:50:37 + Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I second this.
>
> How can you? Is it a proposal or an amendment? Donkey or poultry?
>
> Did you forget your GnuPG signature, or have I broken my email ag
On 2004-02-23 14:37:35 + Stephen Stafford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
IMO it will be decided by simple evolution. When everything that
users want
to
do can be done with software in main, then there won't be the
incentive for
developers to carry on maintaining packages in non-free.
I think
On 2004-02-23 16:21:29 + Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I suppose that Sean's comment was in light of both ATI and NVidia,
being
the two major graphic card vendors out there, decision to no more
provide documentation for their recent graphic card, thus meaning the
death of 3D support
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 10:17:19PM +, Jochen Voss wrote:
> 2) Raul Miller
> submitted 9 Feb 2004
>
> No seconds
>
> Maybe there are older version with seconds?
I'm dropping my proposals in favor of the one recently proposed
by Anthony Towns.
[Aside: I've been off the net sin
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 04:16:46PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> On 2004-02-23 16:21:29 + Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >I suppose that Sean's comment was in light of both ATI and NVidia,
> >being
> >the two major graphic card vendors out there, decision to no more
> >provide documen
On 2004-02-23 19:57:21 + Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Well, if you manage to persuade those players, and a bunch of other
binary-only driver writers, to free their stuff, more power to you,
[...]
Given your previous comments about the unicorn device and your role
with XFree86, I h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
We are well into the final week of he nomination period for
candidates for the position of the Debian Project Leader.
Time Line:
Nomination period: Feb 7th 00:00:01 UTC -- Feb 28th 00:00:00 UTC
Campaigning period: Feb 28th 00:0
* Anthony Towns ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040221 17:10]:
> I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
>
> ==
> Acknowledging that some of our users continue to require the use of
> programs that don't conform to the Debian Free So
Andrew Suffield wrote:
I would hope that everybody who has a vote already knows what we want
the social contract to say, because they agreed to it when they joined
the project. The question of whether or not to keep non-free is
entirely orthogonal and does not affect this GR, by design.
Uh, s
* Anthony Towns ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040223 04:40]:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 07:52:10PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > Editorial amendments to the social contract
>
> > I believe that both of these GRs can begin the SRP immediately. They
> > were designed to be mutually independent so they can
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 01:17:13AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> On 2004-02-21 20:09:57 + Stephen Stafford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >I firmly believe that keeping non-free and contrib until such time as ALL of
> >the needs of our users can be met from main is a good thing.
>
> As you write
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 01:48:48AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
>
> ==
> Acknowledging that some of our users continue to require the use of
> programs that don't conform to the Deb
30 matches
Mail list logo
