On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 01:02:18PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 07:52:10PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > Editorial amendments to the social contract > > > I believe that both of these GRs can begin the SRP immediately. They > > were designed to be mutually independent so they can run in parallel. > > I know I've been avoiding commenting on the editorial changes in any > detail while it's unclear what we actually want to social contract to > say; I suspect others have done likewise. I'll certainly be advocating > further discussion if the editorial changes issue comes to vote before > the non-free issue's been decided.
I would hope that everybody who has a vote already knows what we want the social contract to say, because they agreed to it when they joined the project. The question of whether or not to keep non-free is entirely orthogonal and does not affect this GR, by design. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
