On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 07:03:52PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> For some reason, some people think that quorum should be assessed after
> the vote and should be used to toss the vote if not enough votes were
> received. That has bad properties which can discourage some voters when
> participation i
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 12:42:32AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 07:03:52PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> > For some reason, some people think that quorum should be assessed after
> > the vote and should be used to toss the vote if not enough votes were
> > received. That ha
Hi,
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> What's wrong with "classic quorum" though? Why is your method superior?
Clasic quorum (10): Nine people show up, all of them vote for the resolution,
the motion fails because of unmet quorum.
Person #10 shows up and votes against the resolution, the motion now succee
On Friday, Jun 13, 2003, at 11:27 US/Eastern, Steve Langasek wrote:
In contrast, with an electronic vote that's open for an extended period
and for which quorum is calculated per-vote, classic quorum means it
may be in your best interest to *not* vote on a particular issue if
turnout is low,
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 05:26:57PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Buddha Buck said:
> > or has more not-approved votes than approved votes. Only
> >votes that have a minimum number of approved votes and are approved by
> >more people than don't approve it are considered in the cSSD process.
>
>
Hi,
This is the third call for votes for the Condorcet/Clone Proof
SSD vote tallying GR.
Votes must be received by 23:59:59, Friday, June 20th, 2003
This vote is being conducted in accordance to the Debian Constitution,
Section A, Standard Resolution Procedure, to vote on an Gene
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 12:38:54 -0400, Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> On Friday, Jun 13, 2003, at 11:27 US/Eastern, Steve Langasek wrote:
>>
>> In contrast, with an electronic vote that's open for an extended
>> period and for which quorum is calculated per-vote, classic quorum
>> m
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 07:03:52PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> For some reason, some people think that quorum should be assessed after
> the vote and should be used to toss the vote if not enough votes were
> received. That has bad properties which can discourage some voters when
> participation i
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 12:42:32AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 07:03:52PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> > For some reason, some people think that quorum should be assessed after
> > the vote and should be used to toss the vote if not enough votes were
> > received. That ha
Hi,
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> What's wrong with "classic quorum" though? Why is your method superior?
Clasic quorum (10): Nine people show up, all of them vote for the resolution,
the motion fails because of unmet quorum.
Person #10 shows up and votes against the resolution, the motion now succee
On Friday, Jun 13, 2003, at 11:27 US/Eastern, Steve Langasek wrote:
In contrast, with an electronic vote that's open for an extended period
and for which quorum is calculated per-vote, classic quorum means it
may be in your best interest to *not* vote on a particular issue if
turnout is low,
That's
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 05:26:57PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Buddha Buck said:
> > or has more not-approved votes than approved votes. Only
> >votes that have a minimum number of approved votes and are approved by
> >more people than don't approve it are considered in the cSSD process.
>
>
Hi,
This is the third call for votes for the Condorcet/Clone Proof
SSD vote tallying GR.
Votes must be received by 23:59:59, Friday, June 20th, 2003
This vote is being conducted in accordance to the Debian Constitution,
Section A, Standard Resolution Procedure, to vote on an Gene
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 12:38:54 -0400, Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Friday, Jun 13, 2003, at 11:27 US/Eastern, Steve Langasek wrote:
>>
>> In contrast, with an electronic vote that's open for an extended
>> period and for which quorum is calculated per-vote, classic quorum
>> me
14 matches
Mail list logo
