On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 12:38:54 -0400, Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> On Friday, Jun 13, 2003, at 11:27 US/Eastern, Steve Langasek wrote:
>>
>> In contrast, with an electronic vote that's open for an extended
>> period and for which quorum is calculated per-vote, classic quorum
>> means it may be in your best interest to *not* vote on a particular
>> issue if turnout is low,
> That's no different than with a physical meeting, except that you
> have to leave the building. Consider the recent Democratic walkout
> of the Texas legislature.
Well, boycotts are not needed with our definition of quorum,
since people who do not vote for an option do not count towards the
quorum.
manoj
--
Isn't it ironic that many men spend a great part of their lives
avoiding marriage while single-mindedly pursuing those things that
would make them better prospects?
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
