(I only have time for a quick reply, and I haven't read any of the
other recent discussion carefully.)
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 11:48:53AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> A has a 2:1 supermajority requirement, B has no special majority
> requirement, D is the default option, votes are
> 3 ABD
> 1 BDA
>
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 06:32:26PM -0500, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> (I only have time for a quick reply, and I haven't read any of the
> other recent discussion carefully.)
I think a lot of us are a bit busy. I know I keep intending to write
up another draft, but I've not completed it yet.
> > A d
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 06:32:26PM -0500, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> I see. However, this system (like aj's) still rewards the strategy
> of ranking the default option second, [...]
Yes, it does, and this is entirely deliberate. It's what "supermajority"
is about: allowing minorities to block propos
(I only have time for a quick reply, and I haven't read any of the
other recent discussion carefully.)
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 11:48:53AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> A has a 2:1 supermajority requirement, B has no special majority
> requirement, D is the default option, votes are
> 3 ABD
> 1 BDA
>
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 06:32:26PM -0500, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> (I only have time for a quick reply, and I haven't read any of the
> other recent discussion carefully.)
I think a lot of us are a bit busy. I know I keep intending to write
up another draft, but I've not completed it yet.
> > A d
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 06:32:26PM -0500, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> I see. However, this system (like aj's) still rewards the strategy
> of ranking the default option second, [...]
Yes, it does, and this is entirely deliberate. It's what "supermajority"
is about: allowing minorities to block propos
6 matches
Mail list logo
