On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 06:32:26PM -0500, Andrew Pimlott wrote: > I see. However, this system (like aj's) still rewards the strategy > of ranking the default option second, [...]
Yes, it does, and this is entirely deliberate. It's what "supermajority" is about: allowing minorities to block proposals that the majority likes. If you don't like the idea of supermajority requirements, that's fair enough, but unless you have something _new_ to say, or an alternative that's equally effective at allowing minorities to block proposals and is somehow "fairer", what you have to say isn't very interesting. I also note you don't seem to be a developer or in the n-m queue. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''
pgprfpw2x1j64.pgp
Description: PGP signature
