-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 07:45:39AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I propose the following replacement as per article A.1.5 of our Contitution.
>
>
> The Debian project asks its
Charles Plessy (2014-10-22):
>
>
> The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing General
> Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardless of the outcome of
> the vote.
>
> Regarding the s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Charles Plessy writes ("[Sorry Neil] Wording modification of the The ???no GR,
please??? amendement."):
> I propose the following replacement as per article A.1.5 of our Contitution.
I'm not entirely convinced this is quite reg
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 07:45:39AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Indeed, you are right: by definition, not all questions have been answered.
> The existing wording of the amendement is therefore logically inconsistent.
>
> I propose the following replacement as per article A.1.5 of our Contitutio
Charles Plessy wrote:
> I propose the following replacement as per article A.1.5 of our
> Contitution.
>
>
>
> The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing
> General Resolutions, as the GR process may
On 22/10/14 at 07:45 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I propose the following replacement as per article A.1.5 of our Contitution.
>
>
>
> The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing General
> Resoluti
Hi,
Charles Plessy:
> I propose the following replacement as per article A.1.5 of our Contitution.
>
>
>
> The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing General
> Resolutions, as the GR process may be
I propose the following replacement as per article A.1.5 of our Contitution.
The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing General
Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardl
Hi Charles,
On Mittwoch, 22. Oktober 2014, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I propose the following replacement as per article A.1.5 of our
> Contitution.
>
>
>
> The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing
Le Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 08:13:52PM +0200, Holger Levsen a écrit :
>
> On Dienstag, 21. Oktober 2014, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > my response is "so what? People are doing their jobs, let's not get in
> > their way."
> > I'd rather this amendment not push people away simply because they
> > disagree ov
I want to issue a somewhat blanket apology; I'm trying to get better,
but I do so only in fits and starts.
In my posts about the controversial etch/drivers/freeness issue, I
crossed the line more than once into unhelpful and unreflective
posts. I am sorry, and if you were hurt or offend
Hey debian-user-swedish-request,
According to the LA Times, American's are seriously packing on the pds.
Don't be one of thse people. If so, stop by
www.guarlikechosenpartof.com/ht9/.
You can pass on the favor this weekend ; )
l8,
Harlan Shields
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
12 matches
Mail list logo
