Hi Charles, On Mittwoch, 22. Oktober 2014, Charles Plessy wrote: > I propose the following replacement as per article A.1.5 of our > Contitution. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing > General Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardless of the > outcome of the vote. > > Regarding the subject of this ballot, the Project affirms that the > procedures for decision making and conflict resolution are working > adequately and thus a General Resolution is not required. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > I avoided terms like “premature” and “at this time”, since they leave a bit > of an impression that a GR will definitely be needed, but only later. > This is one of the main resons for my initial reluctance to accept > Antony's and Lucas' comments.
I like this changed version indeed much more, thanks a lot for your work on
this! Writing short texts well is almost an art ;-)
(I don't think I need to formally second this, but if I do, I hereby am.
Please tell me still, I have tiny doubts :)
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
