On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 07:27:28PM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote:
> .SUM A:0 27 24 29 29
> .SUM B: 220 25 29 28
> .SUM C: 25 240 30 32
> .SUM D: 21 21 190 30
> .SUM X: 21 22 18 180
> into it, to get
> .TIE A
> .TIE C
Hello,
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 12:47:11PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> It's a difference from the former implementation because the former
> implementation was wrong.
Maybe not: first it uses a completely different (but equivalent)
method for the computation (beat paths). And second: the
implement
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 01:30:59PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 12:47:11PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> > > C should have been excluded from the Schwartz set, because it has
> > > no votes.
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 04:23:02AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Uh, no it shouldn'
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 12:47:11PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> > Yes: A got 27 votes prefering it over B, B got 22 votes prefering it
> > over A, all preferences involving C have been eliminated.
> > C should have been excluded from the Schwartz set, because it has
> > no votes.
On Mon, Nov 18, 20
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 12:47:11PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> Yes: A got 27 votes prefering it over B, B got 22 votes prefering it
> over A, all preferences involving C have been eliminated.
> C should have been excluded from the Schwartz set, because it has
> no votes.
Uh, no it shouldn't. Where
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 07:27:28PM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote:
> .SUM A:0 27 24 29 29
> .SUM B: 220 25 29 28
> .SUM C: 25 240 30 32
> .SUM D: 21 21 190 30
> .SUM X: 21 22 18 180
> into it, to get
> .TIE A
> .TIE C
> > Minor nit: it's (C,A) which is weakest, as (A,C) is not a proposition.
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 06:31:19PM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote:
> Why not? To quote from your Nov 17 draft:
I changed the definition of proposition between Nov 16 draft
and Nov 17 draft. That above minor nit was in the con
Hello,
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 12:47:11PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> It's a difference from the former implementation because the former
> implementation was wrong.
Maybe not: first it uses a completely different (but equivalent)
method for the computation (beat paths). And second: the
implement
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 09:38:08AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 12:50:59PM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote:
> > ABCDX
> >A- 27 24 29 29
> >B 22- 25 29 28
> >C 25 24- 30 32
> >D 21 21 19
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 01:30:59PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 12:47:11PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> > > C should have been excluded from the Schwartz set, because it has
> > > no votes.
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 04:23:02AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Uh, no it shouldn'
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 12:47:11PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> > Yes: A got 27 votes prefering it over B, B got 22 votes prefering it
> > over A, all preferences involving C have been eliminated.
> > C should have been excluded from the Schwartz set, because it has
> > no votes.
On Mon, Nov 18, 20
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 12:47:11PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> Yes: A got 27 votes prefering it over B, B got 22 votes prefering it
> over A, all preferences involving C have been eliminated.
> C should have been excluded from the Schwartz set, because it has
> no votes.
Uh, no it shouldn't. Where
> > Minor nit: it's (C,A) which is weakest, as (A,C) is not a proposition.
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 06:31:19PM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote:
> Why not? To quote from your Nov 17 draft:
I changed the definition of proposition between Nov 16 draft
and Nov 17 draft. That above minor nit was in the con
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 09:38:08AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 12:50:59PM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote:
> > ABCDX
> >A- 27 24 29 29
> >B 22- 25 29 28
> >C 25 24- 30 32
> >D 21 21 19
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 12:50:59PM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote:
> ABCDX
>A- 27 24 29 29
>B 22- 25 29 28
>C 25 24- 30 32
>D 21 21 19- 30
>X 21 22 18 18-
> the Schwartz set i
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 12:50:59PM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote:
> ABCDX
>A- 27 24 29 29
>B 22- 25 29 28
>C 25 24- 30 32
>D 21 21 19- 30
>X 21 22 18 18-
> the Schwartz set i
Hello,
in order to better understand our new voting draft,
I have completed a new version of my implementation of
the voting algorithm.
Changes are:
* New input format: you can now use the same input
file for my and Anthony Towns's implementation.
* The default option seems to be not requ
Hello,
in order to better understand our new voting draft,
I have completed a new version of my implementation of
the voting algorithm.
Changes are:
* New input format: you can now use the same input
file for my and Anthony Towns's implementation.
* The default option seems to be not requ
18 matches
Mail list logo
