Re: _Our_ resolution merely affirms the status quo

2004-06-11 Thread Bill Allombert
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 06:32:48AM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 01:03:43AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > I'm disappointed at the amount of nonsense being posted in this thread > > along the following lines: > > > > But this is no excuse for arguing the legal technicali

Re: _Our_ resolution merely affirms the status quo

2004-06-04 Thread Graham Wilson
On Sat, Jun 05, 2004 at 06:32:11AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Graham Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040605 06:25]: > > By dropping proposal F from the ballot, we are dropping the only > > proposal that does not support releasing Sarge as is. We will not drop a > > proposal simply because you disa

Re: _Our_ resolution merely affirms the status quo

2004-06-04 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Sat, 5 Jun 2004 06:32:11 +0200, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > * Graham Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040605 06:25]: >> On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 11:01:18AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: >> > I think that you also mean me with your mail. Perhaps you're >> > right, and it may be the best t

Re: _Our_ resolution merely affirms the status quo

2004-06-04 Thread Andreas Barth
* Graham Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040605 06:25]: > On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 11:01:18AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > I think that you also mean me with your mail. Perhaps you're right, > > and it may be the best to drop both proposals F and G from the ballot. > > I wouldn't stand in the way of

Re: _Our_ resolution merely affirms the status quo

2004-06-04 Thread Graham Wilson
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 11:01:18AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > I think that you also mean me with your mail. Perhaps you're right, > and it may be the best to drop both proposals F and G from the ballot. > I wouldn't stand in the way of dropping both proposals together from > the ballot, and vote

Re: _Our_ resolution merely affirms the status quo

2004-06-04 Thread Ian Jackson
Andrew M.A. Cater writes ("Re: _Our_ resolution merely affirms the status quo"): > I posted a comment a long time ago, which might bear repeating > (something close to the text below IIRC). > > The Debian developers changed their policy and fundamental documents > when

Re: _Our_ resolution merely affirms the status quo

2004-06-04 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 01:03:43AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > I'm disappointed at the amount of nonsense being posted in this thread > along the following lines: > > But this is no excuse for arguing the legal technicalities (`what does > the Social Contract mean') as opposed to the moral/practic

Re: _Our_ resolution merely affirms the status quo

2004-06-03 Thread Andreas Barth
* Ian Jackson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040602 07:10]: > I'm disappointed at the amount of nonsense being posted in this thread > along the following lines: > [...] > Now of course I have an opinion about what the Social Contract says > and I think people who disagree either have poor reading comprehens