Re: Proposed amendment: Resolving DFSG violations

2008-10-28 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, > I propose to amend the Robert's resolution by adding the following choice > --- > The Debian project, recognizing that bugs do not fix themselves, > applauds Ben Hutchings's efforts to remove non-DFSG-conformant bits from > the linux-2.6

Re: Proposed amendment: Resolving DFSG violations

2008-10-26 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 26 octobre 2008 à 15:17 +0100, Robert Millan a écrit : > For those who didn't get Josselin's witty remark, this happens because I dared > to complain that my words were being missrepresented by Steve Langasek on IRC, > pretending that I said something I never did. No, this happens beca

Re: Proposed amendment: Resolving DFSG violations

2008-10-26 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > I propose to amend the Robert's resolution by adding the following choice > --- > The Debian project, recognizing that bugs do not fix themselves, > applauds Ben Hutchings's efforts to remove non-DFSG-conformant bits from > the linux-2.

Re: Proposed amendment: Resolving DFSG violations

2008-10-26 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 02:17:46PM +, Robert Millan wrote: > 21:22 < vorlon> oh yes, that's right, *sending chocolate* makes us look > like a bunch of clowns > 21:34 < nyu> vorlon: don't put words in my mouth, thanks > 21:35 < vorlon> nyu: what should I put in your mouth? > > Let this s

Re: Proposed amendment: Resolving DFSG violations

2008-10-26 Thread Robert Millan
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:32:52AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le samedi 25 octobre 2008 à 20:26 +0200, Robert Millan a écrit : > > I'd appreciate if you don't use a GR procedure for that, though, it makes us > > look like a bunch of clowns. > > > it makes us look like a bunch of clowns. > >

Re: Proposed amendment: Resolving DFSG violations

2008-10-26 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le samedi 25 octobre 2008 à 20:26 +0200, Robert Millan a écrit : > I'd appreciate if you don't use a GR procedure for that, though, it makes us > look like a bunch of clowns. > it makes us look like a bunch of clowns. > look like a bunch of clowns > a bunch of clowns > clowns > -- > Robert Mi

Re: Proposed amendment: Resolving DFSG violations

2008-10-25 Thread Robert Millan
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 02:46:47AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 06:40:14PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I propose to amend the Robert's resolution by adding the following choice > >--- > >The Debian project, recognizing that bugs do not fix themselve

Re: Proposed amendment: Resolving DFSG violations

2008-10-24 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > I propose to amend the Robert's resolution by adding the following choice > --- > The Debian project, recognizing that bugs do not fix themselves, > applauds Ben Hutchings's efforts to remov

Re: Proposed amendment: Resolving DFSG violations

2008-10-24 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 06:40:14PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote: >Hi, > >I propose to amend the Robert's resolution by adding the following choice >--- >The Debian project, recognizing that bugs do not fix themselves, >applauds Ben Hutchings's efforts to remove non-DFSG-conformant bits from

Re: Proposed amendment: Resolving DFSG violations

2008-10-24 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 06:40:14PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > Hi, > > I propose to amend the Robert's resolution by adding the following choice > --- > The Debian project, recognizing that bugs do not fix themselves, > applauds Ben Hutchings's efforts to remove non-DFSG-conformant bit

Re: Proposed amendment: Resolving DFSG violations

2008-10-24 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 24 octobre 2008 à 18:40 +0200, Thomas Viehmann a écrit : > --- > The Debian project, recognizing that bugs do not fix themselves, > applauds Ben Hutchings's efforts to remove non-DFSG-conformant bits from > the linux-2.6 package in a way that is still making users a priority. It

Re: Proposed amendment: Resolving DFSG violations

2008-10-24 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Julien BLACHE wrote: >> I belive that Robert's resolution is a waste of time in that it adds > > Doubly so. AOL. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Proposed amendment: Resolving DFSG violations

2008-10-24 Thread Julien BLACHE
Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > I propose to amend the Robert's resolution by adding the following choice > --- > The Debian project, recognizing that bugs do not fix themselves, > applauds Ben Hutchings's efforts to remove non-DFSG-conformant bits from > the linux-2.6 pa

Proposed amendment: Resolving DFSG violations

2008-10-24 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Hi, I propose to amend the Robert's resolution by adding the following choice --- The Debian project, recognizing that bugs do not fix themselves, applauds Ben Hutchings's efforts to remove non-DFSG-conformant bits from the linux-2.6 package in a way that is still making users a priority.