On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 02:46:47AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 06:40:14PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I propose to amend the Robert's resolution by adding the following choice > >----------- > >The Debian project, recognizing that bugs do not fix themselves, > >applauds Ben Hutchings's efforts to remove non-DFSG-conformant bits from > >the linux-2.6 package in a way that is still making users a priority. It > >instructs the project leader to authorize spending of Debian funds to > >send a box of chocolates to Ben. > >----------- > > I've made a point of telling people that I think Ben is about the only > one who deserves any praise for what's been happening on the kernel > front. I'll happily help to push beer/chocolate/$foo at him as a thank > you for that, regardless of any vote here. > > >I belive that Robert's resolution is a waste of time > > Seconded.
As a matter of fact, if you want to send chocolate to Ben I second that too. I'd appreciate if you don't use a GR procedure for that, though, it makes us look like a bunch of clowns. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
