Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Here is how I undesrtanfd the Shall/Will distinction:
>
> Shall is used to express the simple future for first person I
> and we, as in "Shall we meet by the river?" Will would be used
> in the simple future for all other persons. Using will in the
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Here is how I undesrtanfd the Shall/Will distinction:
>
> Shall is used to express the simple future for first person I
> and we, as in "Shall we meet by the river?" Will would be used
> in the simple future for all other persons. Using will in the
>> On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 07:13:33 +0100 (CET),
>> Peter Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava:
>> Why is it harsh? I certainly did not mean it to be. It was meant
>> to be a statement of fact.
> Okay, the use of "shall" instead of "will" just sounded very weird
> to me. But th
Manoj Srivastava:
> Why is it harsh? I certainly did not mean it to be. It was
> meant to be a statement of fact.
Okay, the use of "shall" instead of "will" just sounded very weird to
me. But then again, English is not my mother tongue, so I might just
have misunderstood it.
> Conta
>> On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 07:13:33 +0100 (CET),
>> Peter Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava:
>> Why is it harsh? I certainly did not mean it to be. It was meant
>> to be a statement of fact.
> Okay, the use of "shall" instead of "will" just sounded very weird
> to me. But th
Manoj Srivastava:
> Why is it harsh? I certainly did not mean it to be. It was
> meant to be a statement of fact.
Okay, the use of "shall" instead of "will" just sounded very weird to
me. But then again, English is not my mother tongue, so I might just
have misunderstood it.
> Conta
>> On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 20:21:33 +0100 (CET),
>> Peter Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava:
>> Bottom line, so far there is no way to encrypt a ballot, and
>> encrypting it to my key means it shan't get counted.
> That statement sounds a bit harsh. That it *will* not get cou
>> On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 20:21:33 +0100 (CET),
>> Peter Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava:
>> Bottom line, so far there is no way to encrypt a ballot, and
>> encrypting it to my key means it shan't get counted.
> That statement sounds a bit harsh. That it *will* not get cou
Manoj Srivastava:
> Bottom line, so far there is no way to encrypt a ballot, and
> encrypting it to my key means it shan't get counted.
That statement sounds a bit harsh. That it *will* not get counted I can live
with, but that it *shall* not? Oh well. Maybe it's just me.
Anyway, I just t
Manoj Srivastava:
> Bottom line, so far there is no way to encrypt a ballot, and
> encrypting it to my key means it shan't get counted.
That statement sounds a bit harsh. That it *will* not get counted I can live
with, but that it *shall* not? Oh well. Maybe it's just me.
Anyway, I just t
>> On Sun, 23 Mar 2003 21:30:01 +0100 (CET),
>> Peter Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava:
>> gpg: verify signatures failed: unexpected data Encrypted Ballot 1
> Uh, I thank that's me. Does this mean that one cannot cast the
> votes secretly, but must send them unencrypted?
Manoj Srivastava:
> gpg: verify signatures failed: unexpected data
> Encrypted Ballot 1
Uh, I thank that's me. Does this mean that one cannot cast the votes
secretly, but must send them unencrypted? Or did I use the wrong key (I
used your personal key as the r
On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 07:41:04PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > It was suggested that I also post the mailers that were used
> > in successfully sending a ballot to the voting engine, and here are
> > the results. I am att
>> On Sun, 23 Mar 2003 21:30:01 +0100 (CET),
>> Peter Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava:
>> gpg: verify signatures failed: unexpected data Encrypted Ballot 1
> Uh, I thank that's me. Does this mean that one cannot cast the
> votes secretly, but must send them unencrypted?
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> It was suggested that I also post the mailers that were used
> in successfully sending a ballot to the voting engine, and here are
> the results. I am attaching both the list of good mailers, as well
> as the reasons for rejectio
Manoj Srivastava:
> gpg: verify signatures failed: unexpected data
> Encrypted Ballot 1
Uh, I thank that's me. Does this mean that one cannot cast the votes
secretly, but must send them unencrypted? Or did I use the wrong key (I
used your personal key as the r
Hi,
It was suggested that I also post the mailers that were used
in successfully sending a ballot to the voting engine, and here are
the results. I am attaching both the list of good mailers, as well
as the reasons for rejection of the ballot, with the MUA and count.
I note
On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 07:41:04PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > It was suggested that I also post the mailers that were used
> > in successfully sending a ballot to the voting engine, and here are
> > the results. I am att
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> It was suggested that I also post the mailers that were used
> in successfully sending a ballot to the voting engine, and here are
> the results. I am attaching both the list of good mailers, as well
> as the reasons for rejectio
Hi,
It was suggested that I also post the mailers that were used
in successfully sending a ballot to the voting engine, and here are
the results. I am attaching both the list of good mailers, as well
as the reasons for rejection of the ballot, with the MUA and count.
I note
Hi,
Concerned about the high number of rejected ballots, I want
and manually checked them out. Here are the annotated notes I took,
sorted fiurst by gpg error message, then by the type of MIME
encoding, and finally, by the sending MUA.
I must confess I am impressed by mutt. 140
Hi,
Concerned about the high number of rejected ballots, I want
and manually checked them out. Here are the annotated notes I took,
sorted fiurst by gpg error message, then by the type of MIME
encoding, and finally, by the sending MUA.
I must confess I am impressed by mutt. 140
22 matches
Mail list logo
