Re: Amendment of "removal of non-free" proposal 20040121-13

2004-01-23 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Raul" == Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I second this proposal. Raul> [This is a repost -- Sven Luther has asked that that my call Raul> for seconds is not in reply to any other post.] Raul> This is a call for seconds on the proposal I submitted on Raul> the 19th

Re: Amendment of "removal of non-free" proposal 20040121-13

2004-01-23 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Raul" == Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I second this proposal. Raul> [This is a repost -- Sven Luther has asked that that my call Raul> for seconds is not in reply to any other post.] Raul> This is a call for seconds on the proposal I submitted on Raul> the 19th

Re: Amendment of "removal of non-free" proposal 20040121-13

2004-01-21 Thread Greg Norris
I second this proposal. On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 08:40:14AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > [This is a repost -- Sven Luther has asked that that my call for seconds > is not in reply to any other post.] > > This is a call for seconds on the proposal I submitted

Re: Amendment of "removal of non-free" proposal 20040121-13

2004-01-21 Thread Greg Norris
I second this proposal. On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 08:40:14AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > [This is a repost -- Sven Luther has asked that that my call for seconds > is not in reply to any other post.] > > This is a call for seconds on the proposal I submitted

Re: Amendment of "removal of non-free" proposal 20040121-13

2004-01-21 Thread Hamish Moffatt
I second this proposal. Hamish On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 08:40:14AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > [This is a repost -- Sven Luther has asked that that my call for seconds > is not in reply to any other post.] > > This is a call for seconds on the proposal I su

Re: Amendment of "removal of non-free" proposal 20040121-13

2004-01-21 Thread Hamish Moffatt
I second this proposal. Hamish On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 08:40:14AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > [This is a repost -- Sven Luther has asked that that my call for seconds > is not in reply to any other post.] > > This is a call for seconds on the proposal I su

Re: Amendment of "removal of non-free" proposal 20040121-13

2004-01-21 Thread Sven Luther
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I propose the following resolution: We will replace our social contract with two documents, as specified by the recent constitutional amendment. The first replacement document will be the social contract below, and the second replacement document wi

Re: Amendment of "removal of non-free" proposal 20040121-13

2004-01-21 Thread Sven Luther
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 08:11:27AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > This is a call for seconds on the proposal I submitted on the 19th: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2004/debian-vote-200401/msg01453.html > > Many people have contributed to the wording o

Amendment of "removal of non-free" proposal 20040121-13

2004-01-21 Thread Raul Miller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- [This is a repost -- Sven Luther has asked that that my call for seconds is not in reply to any other post.] This is a call for seconds on the proposal I submitted on the 19th: http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2004/debian-vote-200401/msg01453.html Many peo

Re: Amendment of "removal of non-free" proposal 20040121-13

2004-01-21 Thread Sven Luther
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I propose the following resolution: We will replace our social contract with two documents, as specified by the recent constitutional amendment. The first replacement document will be the social contract below, and the second replacement document wi

Amendment of "removal of non-free" proposal 20040121-13

2004-01-21 Thread Raul Miller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- This is a call for seconds on the proposal I submitted on the 19th: http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2004/debian-vote-200401/msg01453.html Many people have contributed to the wording of this proposal. I believe this proposal is an improvement over the curr

Re: Amendment of "removal of non-free" proposal 20040121-13

2004-01-21 Thread Sven Luther
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 08:11:27AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > This is a call for seconds on the proposal I submitted on the 19th: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2004/debian-vote-200401/msg01453.html > > Many people have contributed to the wording o

Amendment of "removal of non-free" proposal 20040121-13

2004-01-21 Thread Raul Miller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- [This is a repost -- Sven Luther has asked that that my call for seconds is not in reply to any other post.] This is a call for seconds on the proposal I submitted on the 19th: http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2004/debian-vote-200401/msg01453.html Many peo

Amendment of "removal of non-free" proposal 20040121-13

2004-01-21 Thread Raul Miller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- This is a call for seconds on the proposal I submitted on the 19th: http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2004/debian-vote-200401/msg01453.html Many people have contributed to the wording of this proposal. I believe this proposal is an improvement over the curr