hich doesn't have this section.
So that would mean two sets of images. What is the advantage of this
section over pulling firmwares from non-free into a second set of
images?
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
rying to
remove some lenny blockers. It might be an useful vote to speed up the
release of lenny, but it might also be a release killing vote such as
"we wont release lenny with DFSG violations". I hope a lenny ballot
wouldn't have such an option, but it might.
--
L
osed resolutions (that
they'd apply after lenny) has anything to do with the fact that we vote
on them separately or on a single ballot.
One reason it's worse is that we will effectively take only one
decision instead of at least 3 or 4.
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
d enough seconds; if you think we need
more seconds for GRs, propose a GR.
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
ate votes...
> There was no such proposal during the discussion period.
It was your decision to make a single ballot out of these orthogonal
issues, do not present the situation as being the proposers' fault.
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
ntract and may or may not diverge in practice. This choice doesn't
have any practical impact and doesn't change any rule or project
opinion.
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
all agreed to honor the social contract
anyway.
Apart of the noise of choice 1, this ballot doesn't empower us to
decide on the 4 different questions.
So I understand that we intend to honor all choices which beat NOTA,
i.e. not only the highest ranked choice.
Bye
--
Loïc Minie
rce. While we do
> | prefer firmware that comes with source and documentation we will not
> | require it,
> | b) we however do require all other freedoms that the DFSG mandate from
> | components of our operating system, and
> | c) such firmware can and should be pa
I'd support it; I don't mind alternate
proposals using new archive sections, or whatever new way to classify
firmware on a Debian system either.
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
d Charter concept looks
like working around the Constitution's change process.
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
don't fit with your imagination.
Too bad you couldn't be bothered to read "Not everybody wants to be
DD". Please leave my imagination alone, thanks.
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> If someone can make such packages, he should become a DD, full stop.
Don't bother replying if you don't read the thread.
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
he case nowadays).
So are you saying that an unexpected consequence of the Debian
maintainers uploading their packages alone could be that the Debian
sponsors would have to look for different packages to sponsor?
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> - Not everybody wants to be DD. [1]
> - Not everybody deserves to be DD. [2]
> - Everybody who is able to properly maintain a package according to our
> rules should have the possibility to maintain that package.
But what if this results in higher
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Flamewars are actually fun, when done properly.
Oh right; the fun part must be an omission on
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flaming> -- unless
you meant the artistic type of flamewars. ;)
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007, Clown Adams wrote:
> Are you referring to Frans or AJ when you say that?
Don't be jealous.
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
een shutdown
completely at multiple times and for various occasions.
> > it sounds pointless to discuss what rights remain to them.
>I could not agree more: discussion has shown to be pointless indeed,
> hence the GR. Or so I guess.
So, a pointless discussion in response to a
R is about revoking some ftpmasters rights which
should be exercized with judgment, it sounds pointless to discuss what
rights remain to them.
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Where's the vote.debian.org page?
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I confirm the short voting period. (This is also mentionned in the
proposed WML pages for the website.)
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
discussion
I'm attaching the proposed WML page for this vote (vote_006.wml).
Bye,
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
General Resolution: Re-affirm support to the Debian Project Leader
P
#use wml::debian::template title="" BARETITLE="true" NOHEADER="true&quo
t's a useful thing to do.
I wish the vote starts as soon as possible. I am fine with either one
ballot or separates ballots. Denis, do you have a preference in the
number of ballots?
Bye,
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
; address dunc-tank in a General Resolution.
> ->8-
So, if this resolution wins the vote, it will contradict itself since
we will have had a GR on Dunc yet we find it not appropriate to
have one?
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2006, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > The Debian Project reaffirms its support to its DPL.
> > The Debian Project does not object to the experiment named "Duck
> > Tank"
>I do not like how this "not objec
nk is a mean
to disguise bribes?
I fail to see why the problems you describe were not problems two
months or two years ago.
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Dunc-Tank"" and
"The Debian Project wishes success to projects funding Debian or
helping towards the release of Etch.", which is something which was
meant to be as consensual as "we wish nice things to people wanting
nice thinkgs for Debian", but it seems
proposal (as I understand it).
Please recall your GR proposal.
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
x27;t it be, it wouldn't get sponsors.
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lopers, users and
supporters of Debian.
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006, Loïc Minier wrote:
> I'm sorry for the typo, it is Dunc-Tank. Updated text attached.
How embarassing. I keep making typos, I hope this cheers readers up.
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Debian Project reaffirms its support to its DPL.
The Debia
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006, Loïc Minier wrote:
> The Debian Project does not object to the experiment named "Duck Tank", lead
> by
I'm sorry for the typo, it is Dunc-Tank. Updated text attached.
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Debian Project reaffirms its supp
There's always None of the above, but I am pissed enough by the
attitude of some developers that I want to reaffirm support for the
elected DPL whatever he does to suppose Debian outside of the project.
(The text of the proposal is attached.)
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
roken article?
Would you read an article claiming that Debian buys Ubuntu stock and
then call the leader a fraud? What if the article would claim that KDE
is sluggish in Debian?
I'm deeply disappointed by the french cabal supporting this DPL
bashing. Please do feel responsible for the f
.
I'm impressed by the energy and creativity Anthony found for this
issue, even if I strongely objected to his initial plan. Please, don't
be the one blocking innovation in Debian; be innovant instead.
Thanks,
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
7;s opinion on firmware, madwifi is
> clearly non-free.
Yes, that's why we (including Aurélien) want to keep it in non-free.
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
35 matches
Mail list logo
