On Tuesday 31 July 2007 10:48, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Oh, that reminds me.
>
> I propose we change section 5.2 of the constitution concerning
> appointment of the Project Leader to reduce the nomination period
> to a week, and the voting period to two weeks. In wdiff format:
>
> =
> 5.2. Appo
On Thursday 21 June 2007 16:50, Anthony Towns wrote:
> * multiple Debian developers have requested the individual's
> removal for non-spurious reasons; eg, due to problematic
> uploads, unfixed bugs, or being unreasonably difficult to
> work with.
This by itself is to
Two simple questions:
a) Is there anything you regret doing in the past year (as DPL of
course)?
b) are there things you didn't have time to do in the first year but
would like to do if you would get elected again?
Regards
Konstantinos
pgpM0z1cXzTXy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
This must be contagious :-)
On ÎÎÏÏÎÏÎ 04 ÎÏÏÏ 2005 21:32, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> || On Sun, 03 Apr 2005 18:26:16 -0500
> || Debian Project Secretary <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (va, manoj)>
> || wrote:
>
> dps> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- dps> 4634844
On ÎÏÎÏÎ 15 ÎÎÏÏÎÎÏ 2005 15:12, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Traditionally, the people doing work have been, uh, the people who
> do the work. If people are in a position where they should be doing
> work and are failing to do so, then it's already possible for the
> DPL to remove them and appoint a ne
Hello everyone,
So far, we've been discussing voting for position of the DPL, which
undeniably, is the highest rank -or whatever you wish to call it,
that's not the point i'm trying to make- within Debian.
However, as every past, present and (possibly) future, DPL will
probably tell you, the D
On ÎÏÏ 13 ÎÎÏÏÎÎÏ 2005 18:28, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> What's the compatible replacement for Times New Roman?
Compatible in what way? Do you need just a serif font? Or do you need
some serif font that looks exactly like Times New Roman, same
kerning, dimensions, etc but is not TImes New Roman?
On ÎÏÏ 13 ÎÎÏÏÎÎÏ 2005 15:53, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> - eclipse
> - msttcorefonts
I can't speak about the rest of this list, but kaffe is now able to
run eclipse 3.0.1, which means that eclipse will sooner or later
enter main.
As for msttcorefonts, do we really need it? There are quit
On Wednesday 07 April 2004 23:12, Adam Heath wrote:
> There are countless incidents in Debian's past, where some existing
> developer has left in outrage, because of either some disagreement,
> or having something demanded of them(this list is not exhaustive).
> At any point, a developer can deci
On Wednesday 07 April 2004 23:12, Adam Heath wrote:
> There are countless incidents in Debian's past, where some existing
> developer has left in outrage, because of either some disagreement,
> or having something demanded of them(this list is not exhaustive).
> At any point, a developer can deci
On Wednesday 24 March 2004 22:20, Raul Miller wrote:
> People have lots of trouble understanding many other things, too.
> Included in the set of things that people have trouble
> understanding are people, computers, and just about everything
> else.
IMHO, the only thing that is actually difficult
On Wednesday 24 March 2004 06:34, Anand Kumria wrote:
> I, personally, suspect that the unfriendliness of Debian is behind
> a lot of requests for smaller mailing lists seen by listmaster
> these days. A lot of people don't bother to use the main mailing
> lists anymore but instead find it simpler
On Wednesday 24 March 2004 22:20, Raul Miller wrote:
> People have lots of trouble understanding many other things, too.
> Included in the set of things that people have trouble
> understanding are people, computers, and just about everything
> else.
IMHO, the only thing that is actually difficult
On Wednesday 24 March 2004 06:34, Anand Kumria wrote:
> I, personally, suspect that the unfriendliness of Debian is behind
> a lot of requests for smaller mailing lists seen by listmaster
> these days. A lot of people don't bother to use the main mailing
> lists anymore but instead find it simpler
Hi to all,
I have been following the past discussions on -vote, though I stayed
quiet, being busy etc.
Straight to the point:
1. Debian currently supports more than 10 arches (just a quick check
in /ports. Obviously, trying to keep in sync all of them is too much.
And I hope I'm not the only
Hi to all,
I have been following the past discussions on -vote, though I stayed
quiet, being busy etc.
Straight to the point:
1. Debian currently supports more than 10 arches (just a quick check
in /ports. Obviously, trying to keep in sync all of them is too much.
And I hope I'm not the only
st of us are used to knowing where to look for something,
or the difference between using free/non-free software, new users don't.
Remember the important thing is not freeness of software, it's its
usefullness. THe fact that freeness allows for software to become useful is
not the goal, it is the means.
--
Konstantinos Margaritis
27;t judge by the looks says it all".
Let's drop this whole conversation and proceed. The vote itself
will render this whole deal a good or bad choice.
--
Konstantinos Margaritis
18 matches
Mail list logo
