Hello everyone, So far, we've been discussing voting for position of the DPL, which undeniably, is the highest rank -or whatever you wish to call it, that's not the point i'm trying to make- within Debian.
However, as every past, present and (possibly) future, DPL will probably tell you, the DPL cannot enforce anyone to do anything, he can only point to the right direction, influence and motivate people to do their tasks and perhaps help settle things down when flames go ablaze :-) Don't misunderstand me, I don't underestimate the DPL's position, it's just the structure of Debian is such, that while we argue about Democracy all the time, I don't think we live by it. So, what I actually would like to ask the DPL candidates is how they view a possible proposal of actually using democratic methods for all key positions within Debian. Just as a DPL has to convince everyone of his/her worth, why shouldn't the same apply to other (possibly more important) positions? Debian is not the 50 people team it used to be. Yes, I am actually proposing this. Regards Konstantinos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
