Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> a65763d3-b1e2-4530-8ff8-aa5915274eb4
> [ 2 ] Choice 1: Re-affirm DPL, wish success to unofficial Dunc Tank
> [ 1 ] Choice 2: Re-affirm DPL, do not endorse nor support his other projects
>
Marc Haber wrote:
> I find that response utterly inappropriate. It would be inappropriate
> even during the campaign.
What's specifically is inappropriate about publically stating one's
opinion of a candidate, whether positive or negative, after being
nominated for the posi
et inflammed/insulting over its
weaknesses.
--
Kevin Rosenberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I expect it's because we say things like "James, have you got a minute?"
> and "thanks for your help" instead of "[YOU] ARE [TOO] LAZY TO WORK AND
> [TOO] LEET TO COMMUNICATE WIT
Steve Langasek wrote:
> [snip]
> discussion period ASAP. I am looking for seconds for this proposal, or
> barring that, amendments.
I seconded the proposal.
--
Kevin Rosenberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steve Langasek wrote:
> [snip]
> discussion period ASAP. I am looking for seconds for this proposal, or
> barring that, amendments.
I seconded the proposal.
--
Kevin Rosenberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
may not be good for them in the short term; I believe that it is
> good for them in the long term.
I'm happy to be voting for productivity in the short-term.
--
Kevin Rosenberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
may not be good for them in the short term; I believe that it is
> good for them in the long term.
I'm happy to be voting for productivity in the short-term.
--
Kevin Rosenberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Craig Sanders wrote:
> and just in case you miss the point of this message: some of us are sick to
> death of this topic.
Oh, yes, indeed. It seems like people have been trying to change the
SC ever since I joined Debian.
--
Kevin Rosenberg| .''`. **
Craig Sanders wrote:
> and just in case you miss the point of this message: some of us are sick to
> death of this topic.
Oh, yes, indeed. It seems like people have been trying to change the
SC ever since I joined Debian.
--
Kevin Rosenberg| .''`. **
ing non-free on the Debian servers is to
avoid such a duplication of effort. If results of the current vote
reaffirms support for non-free, why would maintainers want to work on
such duplication and move packages to the parallel system?
--
Kevin Rosenberg| .''`. ** Debi
ing non-free on the Debian servers is to
avoid such a duplication of effort. If results of the current vote
reaffirms support for non-free, why would maintainers want to work on
such duplication and move packages to the parallel system?
--
Kevin Rosenberg| .''`. ** Debi
11 matches
Mail list logo
