On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 03:07:20PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> > You can't have it both ways! The standard Debian answer to a good
> > idea is 'show us the code'. Well, in this case, the code was written
> > and demonstrated. It would obviously not be difficult to integrate it
> > with
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 03:07:20PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> > You can't have it both ways! The standard Debian answer to a good
> > idea is 'show us the code'. Well, in this case, the code was written
> > and demonstrated. It would obviously not be difficult to integrate it
> > with
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 09:34:21PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2002 23:19:40 +
> Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 05:05:53AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > To take a fairly trivial example from -dev
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 09:34:21PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2002 23:19:40 +
> Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 05:05:53AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > To take a fairly trivial example from -dev
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 05:05:53AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> To take a fairly trivial example from -devel right now: people have been
> going on and on about wanting to make Packages files easier to download
> for ages now, and the threads take the exact same path each time:
> "let's split them
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 05:05:53AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> To take a fairly trivial example from -devel right now: people have been
> going on and on about wanting to make Packages files easier to download
> for ages now, and the threads take the exact same path each time:
> "let's split the
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 12:22:15AM +1100, Edward C. Lang wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 05:14:23PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > In fact there was one rather controversial regular at the time who'd
> > > been rejected as a maintainer.
> >
> > Who was that? Maybe it will help jog my memor
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 12:22:15AM +1100, Edward C. Lang wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 05:14:23PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > In fact there was one rather controversial regular at the time who'd
> > > been rejected as a maintainer.
> >
> > Who was that? Maybe it will help jog my memo
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 08:22:13AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 07:56:45AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > I was under the impression that ballots were supposed to be kept secret
> > for DPL elections.
>
> Argh!
>
> Folks, I misread the constitution.
>
> Shoot me, now.
>
>
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 08:22:13AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 07:56:45AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > I was under the impression that ballots were supposed to be kept secret
> > for DPL elections.
>
> Argh!
>
> Folks, I misread the constitution.
>
> Shoot me, now.
>
>
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 07:35:52AM -0500, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 02:42:53AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> > > I do not want to see non-free more readily available,
> > > I would in fact like for it to wither and die. That's n
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 07:35:52AM -0500, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 02:42:53AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> > > I do not want to see non-free more readily available,
> > > I would in fact like for it to wither and die. That's
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:29:15PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Nevertheless, if elected DPL, I realize that I turn the temperature
> > down on my occasional email flame of a fellow developer. That's a
> > sacrifice I'm willing to make.
>
> It's funny that someone who
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:29:15PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Nevertheless, if elected DPL, I realize that I turn the temperature
> > down on my occasional email flame of a fellow developer. That's a
> > sacrifice I'm willing to make.
>
> It's funny that someone wh
ead
;)
--
Jules Bean |Any sufficiently advanced
[EMAIL PROTECTED],jellybean.co.uk} | technology is indistinguishable
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | from a perl script
15 matches
Mail list logo
