ar?
>
>This is more a question for the release manager.
>
>Wichert.
>
>
--
Armageddon means never having to say you're sorry.
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!
ar?
>
>This is more a question for the release manager.
>
>Wichert.
>
>
--
Armageddon means never having to say you're sorry.
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Whatever. This is getting us nowhere. On DD I've been trying to be the
peacemaker, I guess I should try it here. We now return you to your
regularly scheduled flamefest.
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 03:14:17PM -0700, John Galt wrote:
>
Whatever. This is getting us nowhere. On DD I've been trying to be the
peacemaker, I guess I should try it here. We now return you to your
regularly scheduled flamefest.
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 03:14:17PM -0700, John Galt wrote:
>
On 14 Nov 2000, John Goerzen wrote:
> John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > Uh, non-free is not going on Progeny CDs. non-free is not now, and
> > > never was, on Debian CDs. I have no desire to see non-free on either
> > > CDs. I want neither to
On 14 Nov 2000, John Goerzen wrote:
> John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > Uh, non-free is not going on Progeny CDs. non-free is not now, and
> > > never was, on Debian CDs. I have no desire to see non-free on either
> > > CDs. I want n
00 at 12:33:39PM -0700, John Galt wrote:
> > The DPS is not completely blameless in this issue, but "let ye who is
> > without sin cast the first stone"
>
> An interesting allusion from a Randroid.
>
>
--
There is an old saying that if a million monkeys typed on
On 14 Nov 2000, John Goerzen wrote:
> Well, your e-mail was so illogical and senseless that I almost wonder
> if it's worth my time reading it, but I'll reply anyway.
Getting close to the last refuge of the incompetent?
> John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
00 at 12:33:39PM -0700, John Galt wrote:
> > The DPS is not completely blameless in this issue, but "let ye who is
> > without sin cast the first stone"
>
> An interesting allusion from a Randroid.
>
>
--
There is an old saying that if a million monkeys typed on
On 14 Nov 2000, John Goerzen wrote:
> Well, your e-mail was so illogical and senseless that I almost wonder
> if it's worth my time reading it, but I'll reply anyway.
Getting close to the last refuge of the incompetent?
> John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
On 13 Nov 2000, John Goerzen wrote:
> John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > No, the months of tedious flamewars were brought about by your
> > hypocritical, ill-advised, and divisive GR. The DPS is not completely
> > blameless in this issue, but "let y
On 13 Nov 2000, John Goerzen wrote:
> John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > No, the months of tedious flamewars were brought about by your
> > hypocritical, ill-advised, and divisive GR. The DPS is not completely
> > blameless in this issue, but "let y
; > must be very disconcerting.
>
> If something would actually happen, that would be good.
>
> Make no mistake about it; the months of tedious flamewars about
> procedural issues were brought about because of the Secretary's
> inaction and extra-Constitutional behavio
ail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Do your part to help preserve life on Earth -- by trying to preserve your own.
John Galt ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Constitutional behavior.
>
>
--
Do your part to help preserve life on Earth -- by trying to preserve your own.
John Galt ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Do your part to help preserve life on Earth -- by trying to preserve your own.
John Galt ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
more, to amend
> the Constitution to remove from the Secretary the ability to
> single-handedly kill any GR that he doesn't like or doesn't feel
> warrants his time.
>
>
--
FINE, I take it back: UNfuck you!
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!
more, to amend
> the Constitution to remove from the Secretary the ability to
> single-handedly kill any GR that he doesn't like or doesn't feel
> warrants his time.
>
>
--
FINE, I take it back: UNfuck you!
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e the potential for competence.
On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 03:37:05PM -0600, John Galt wrote:
> > Of course, refutation by name calling isn't exactly unheard of in
> > "mainstream" political types...
>
> On another no
ise
you have the potential for competence.
On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 03:37:05PM -0600, John Galt wrote:
> > Of course, refutation by name calling isn't exactly unheard of in
> > "mainstream" political types...
>
> On another no
Of course, refutation by name calling isn't exactly unheard of in
"mainstream" political types...
On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 03:07:26AM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> > John Galt wrote:
> > > > However, I find konqueror
Of course, refutation by name calling isn't exactly unheard of in
"mainstream" political types...
On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 03:07:26AM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> > John Galt wrote:
> > > > However, I find konqueror
On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Joey Hess wrote:
> Joseph Carter wrote:
> > Without regard to constitutionality, I believe there are technical reasons
> > why non-free should remain a little while longer. Netscape is the biggest
> > of them at the moment since currently Mozilla is not ready to replace it.
>
On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Joey Hess wrote:
> Joseph Carter wrote:
> > Without regard to constitutionality, I believe there are technical reasons
> > why non-free should remain a little while longer. Netscape is the biggest
> > of them at the moment since currently Mozilla is not ready to replace it.
24 matches
Mail list logo
