Re: CoC policy for package contents

2025-07-21 Thread Iustin Pop
On 2025-07-22 13:26:12, Simon Richter wrote: > Hi, > > On 7/22/25 02:22, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > > I.e. we just can't afford to be the morality police, but we agree with > > > it and wish someone would do it. > > > More like, we think it's a good idea if someone did it, but it's not the > >

Re: CoC policy for package contents (was: Re: Can the community team remove packages or kick me out for not removing packages?)

2025-07-21 Thread Iustin Pop
e On 2025-07-21 13:02:32, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 04:34:40PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > > The standard that we hold *ourselves* to is considerably more than just > > "don't be racist" for any definition of racist. The code of conduct we > > passed via GR says: > > > >

Re: Debian Project Leader Elections 2019: Call for nominations

2019-03-14 Thread Iustin Pop
gt; enough to know some details! > > (And I hope that other former DPLs will post their own views) > > On 13/03/19 at 20:35 +0100, Iustin Pop wrote: > > From my reading of the DPL bits, and if I remember correctly, there are > > a few of what seems to be separate areas: &

Re: Debian Project Leader Elections 2019: Call for nominations

2019-03-13 Thread Iustin Pop
On 2019-03-13 15:13:33, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > (Dropping Chris from CC: as he is subscribed to -vote) > > On 2019-03-12 16:55, Paulo Henrique de Lima Santana wrote: > > > > Mehdi, would you like to run again? > > I saw you run in 2017 and you have experience as DPL. > > > > I am really not sure

Re: New amdendment proposal (Re: Proposed GR: Acknowledge difficulty of declassifying debian-private)

2016-09-30 Thread Iustin Pop
On 2016-09-21 11:01:50, Iain Lane wrote: > This is a new proposal which supersedes my previous one > <20160920165427.oeiaxkms7e63bao4@nightingale> (that proposal is > withdrawn). > > > > Title: debian-private shall remain pr

Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems

2014-10-16 Thread Iustin Pop
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 04:05:41PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > I wish to propose the following general resolution, and hereby call > for seconds. This GR resolution proposal is identical to that > proposed by Matthew Vernon in March: > https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2014/03/msg0.html >

Re: Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems

2014-03-09 Thread Iustin Pop
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 09:52:54AM +, Matthew Vernon wrote: > Hi, > > Matthew Vernon writes: > > > I wish to propose the following general resolution, and hereby call > > for seconds. I don't think further lengthy discussion of the issues is > > > > This has only had one second. In order

Re: [Call for seconds] GR: diversity statement for the Debian Project

2012-05-07 Thread Iustin Pop
l) that "It doesn't matter" has the feeling of "we don't > care" while "no matter" has a better feel. > > * corrected wrapping of last lines, thanks to Iustin Pop > > At the end of the mail, a couple of FAQ about the diversity statemen