Re: Proposed amendment: Resolving DFSG violations

o remove non-DFSG-conformant bits from > the linux-2.6 package in a way that is still making users a priority. It > instructs the project leader to authorize spending of Debian funds to > send a box of chocolates to Ben. > --- Seconded. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno

Re: [DRAFT] resolving DFSG violations

Paul Wise a écrit : > On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 12:54 AM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 05:50:40PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >>> An example of such a package is glibc (bug#382175). I don't think that >>> removing SUNRPC

Re: [DRAFT] resolving DFSG violations

On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 02:21:17PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 22:31 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > I knew I haven't quote enough parts of DFSG: > > > > 5. Works that do not meet our free software standards > > > > We acknowle

Re: [DRAFT] resolving DFSG violations

Robert Millan a écrit : > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 08:36:03PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> | 4. Our priorities are our users and free software >> >> | We will be guided by *the needs of our users* and the free software >> | community. We will place their interests *f

Re: [DRAFT] resolving DFSG violations

der. Which will no doubt be done really soon by > anyone who's actually interested in supporting non-free stuff (unlike myself). > | 4. Our priorities are our users and free software | We will be guided by *the needs of our users* and the free software | community. We will place their in

Re: [DRAFT] resolving DFSG violations

ason to pressure them > > more than useful. > > This ain't true. Some of these bugs were known since 2006, and even 2004. > See my report in #497823 (second mail). > And you weren't able to provide a patch in all this time? -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno

Re: [DRAFT] resolving DFSG violations

Robert Millan a écrit : > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 05:50:40PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> An example of such a package is glibc (bug#382175). I don't think that >> removing SUNRPC support (and with it NIS, NFS and more) is a suitable >> choice (unless we want to

Re: [DRAFT] resolving DFSG violations

th it NIS, NFS and more) is a suitable choice (unless we want to lose all users who haven't switched yet to Ubuntu). The bug being more than 60 days old, does it mean that we have to move glibc to non-free (and with it, half of the archive to contrib)? It would be faster to move everythi

Re: Constitutional amendment: reduce the length of DPL election process

n >A.6 of the Standard Resolution Procedure. The quorum is the same >as for a General Resolution (4.2) and the default option is "None >Of The Above". > 8. The Project Leader serves for one year from their election. > = > Se

Re: Question for all candidates, was: Google SoC 2007 - we're in, sign up quickly!

e useless micro-management. ^^^ Given most of your emails to debian-vote include the words "DPL board", I suppose that it is a mistake and the same applies here. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian develo

To all candidates: distribution of your actions over the term

approaches. At this moment they start to be very active, they start doing a lot of announcements. They seek for re-election. If you get elected, how do you plan to distribute your actions over the term of office and avoid what I just described above? Cheers, Aurelien -- .''`. Aure

Re: Question to the candidates: inclusion of the kFreeBSD-* ports

84 92 Looking at these number you could see that debian-mips, debian-ia64, debian-s390 and debian-hppa are generating less traffic than debian-bsd. BTW, I wonder if we really need a debian-s390 mailing list that almost only catch spam. Cheers, Aurelien -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno

Re: Summary for the upload package rules GR

r not. That's also something I want to see, along with giving the right to at least one porter of an architecture an access to the wanna-build database. But we, as simple DD, can't decide about that. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :'

Re: Question to the candidates: inclusion of the kFreeBSD-* ports

ian.org/ArchiveQualification/kfreebsd-i386 -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net --

Re: BREAKING NEWS: Debian developers aren't trusted

nd thus reduce the problems you described above. But it seems DSA has ignored the mail from Bill. Cheers, Aurelien [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/2006/11/msg8.html -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electric

Re: BREAKING NEWS: Debian developers aren't trusted

[2] [3]. Bye, Aurelien [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/2007/01/msg00085.html [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2007/01/msg01363.html [3] http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=xulrunner&arch=arm&ver=1.8.0.9-1 -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno

Re: [GR] DD should be allowed to perform binary-only uploads

ng No, it's not me I have no alpha machine, and I there is no alpha developer accessible machine. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [GR] DD should be allowed to perform binary-only uploads

rs allowed to perform > combined source and binary packages uploads should be allowed to perform > binary-only packages uploads for the same set of architectures. > > --- Seconded. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GP

Re: [AMENDMENT] Re: seconds searched for override of resolution 007 needed.

rom the release manager." Aurelien [1] http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-people.debi

Re: Call for votes for "GR: Recall the project leader"

> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > 49a98df6-2bd4-40c8-a559-7e15212dbd26 > [ 1 ] Choice 1: Recall the project leader > [ 2 ] Choice 2: Further discussion > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: Another proposal

de Debian. Seconded -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Proposal: Recall the Project Leader

, it's the link given by Anthony himself with the link to dunc-tank.org. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-people.debia

Re: Proposal: Recall the Project Leader

Constitution (section 4.1.1) and am seeking seconds > for this proposal. Seconded. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-people.de

Re: Amendment: special exception for firmware because of technical limitations

Joey Hess a écrit : Aurelien Jarno wrote: Not also that I found sad that the DPL try to kill this GR with his latest mail to debian-announce. The problem is known for a long time. How does posting straw polls of our users and developers to d-d-a manage to look to you like an attempt to stop

Re: Amendment: special exception for firmware because of technical limitations

il to debian-announce. The problem is known for a long time. If he wanted to help, it should have been done that before, not a 3 months before the announced date of the release. And also not while proposals are beeing discussed. He just want to be awarded because he found a solution to the proble

Re: Proposal: The DFSG do not require source code for data, including firmware

uired until we have the technical means to split them out in a convenient way for our users. (Not perfect either :/ ) Seconded. This is a good proposition, as it does not allow firmwares already in non-free (eg madwifi) to go into main. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: