On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 02:18:12PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 07:56:36AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > This is a two-way street though. Aurelien was trying to solve a problem > > he perceived to exist with the arm port. His solution has been rejected, > > but is the original problem being addressed? > > ] I am really upset by the way the ARM build daemons are managed. The > ] packages are not uploaded regularly, with sometimes three days between > ] two uploads. [...] > ] > ] All of that resulted in ARM being the slowest architecture to build > ] packages. [...] > > -- http://blog.aurel32.net/?p=33 > > I don't imagine Aurelien's any less upset, but as far as I can see, there > aren't actual problems with the way arm's keeping up at present: > > http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph2-quarter-big.png
Strangely the things has improved recently, this is even visible on the graph (around 2007.03). Also most of the packages are now requeued automagically after a few days. It wasn't the case before, and request took very long time before being proceeded [1] [2] [3]. Bye, Aurelien [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/2007/01/msg00085.html [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2007/01/msg01363.html [3] http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=xulrunner&arch=arm&ver=1.8.0.9-1 -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]