Re: Opposing strict time limits

2021-10-25 Thread Holger Levsen
hi, i'm just following along, so please excuse my brief comments from the sidelines... On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 11:15:18AM -0600, Sam Hartman wrote: > Wouter and I are going to disagree on this, but I actually think that > the work I did during the latest systemd vote significantly helped move > t

Re: Opposing strict time limits

2021-10-25 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Nikolaus" == Nikolaus Rath writes: Nikolaus> On Oct 22 2021, Wouter Verhelst wrote: >> I also believe that a ballot with options that were written by >> people who do not support that option will usually result in a >> cluttered ballot, with various options that are almost

Re: Opposing strict time limits

2021-10-25 Thread Nikolaus Rath
On Oct 22 2021, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > I also believe that a ballot with options that were written by people > who do not support that option will usually result in a cluttered > ballot, with various options that are almost but not quite the same > thing, and options that are irrelevant noise a

Re: Opposing strict time limits

2021-10-25 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 03:53:38PM -0500, Richard Laager wrote: > On 10/24/21 2:01 PM, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > 6. The project leader may, at any point in the process, set the > > discussion period to any length between 1 and 3 weeks, except that > > they may not do so in a way that cause