hi, i'm just following along, so please excuse my brief comments from the sidelines...
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 11:15:18AM -0600, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Wouter and I are going to disagree on this, but I actually think that
> the work I did during the latest systemd vote significantly helped move
> the discussion forward. By trying to listen to various sides and trying
> to present several options I think I managed to frame the process in a
> way that was more constructive.
>
> I'm sure that process can be refined. But I'd rather see DPLs do that
> work more rather than less.
>
> I also don't want to see that work restricted to the DPL. In many cases
> I'd rather see ballot options drafted by people in the middle rather
> than by strong proponents of a polarized position.
actually I'm not so sure I want the DPL to be regularily involved in such
activities. Undoubtfully these activities are usefull, but I fear they
might be less useful when done by the DPL...
[this is a generic remark, not based on the systemd vote.]
> 1) Remember that we want to move toward secret ballots.
Do *we*, really? I'm not sure I like the idea but at least I recall some
people discussing this. Also I'm pretty sure many people^wDebian members have
not even heard this being discussed.
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
⠈⠳⣄
If you upload your address book to "the cloud", I don't want to be in it.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
