On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 20:24 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 05:52:28PM +, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > This is the part I am not comfortable with. I do not think the
> > > delegates have the powers to decide w
[NO CC, please]
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 14:59 -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
>> If we waited for a release to be 100% perfect, it will likely take
>> several more years. The good news is that the amount of inline firmware
>> in the kernel is decreasing. So, eventually, a
- "Aníbal Monsalve Salazar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Sun employee is the Chief Open Source Officer at Sun
> Microsystems,
> Simon Phipps.
I'll be at Apachecon in two weeks and Simon Phipps is scheduled to be there.
I'll ask him about the SUNRPC issue. Would someone privately mail me
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 01:15:55PM +, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21 2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>
>
> > And you're comfortable with ftp-master ruling DFSG-iness through NEW
> > then ? I don't really see the difference.
>
> I would be uncomoftable with ftp-masters willfull
On Tue, Oct 21 2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> And you're comfortable with ftp-master ruling DFSG-iness through NEW
> then ? I don't really see the difference.
I would be uncomoftable with ftp-masters willfully allowing DFSG
violations in main without ratification from the project as a w
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 02:17:37PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 22:47 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Doing so would be a violation of basic NMU policy.
> The claim was, hey, nobody is stopping anyone from fixing it, if it's
> not fixed, it's lame for people to complain,
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 08:24:01AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> Common guys, they are simply refusing to do the work which is their
> rights, but they will accept patches. Some bugs are opened for 4 years,
> and I still do not see any patch to provide a loading firmware
> mechanism.
>
> On t
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:31:34PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >
> > Which means that as per SC #4 you're welcome to package those firmware blobs
> > and provide them in the non-free repository.
>
> That's exactly what I meant, instead of simply dropping support of
> hardware, as you suggested
8 matches
Mail list logo
